create account

RE: Casual sharing and shitposts by mengao

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @elmerlin/re-mengao-ru08zu

· @mengao ·
But this should be done in the blockchain level, not frontend, as we go back to the original concern, that is exploiting the reward pool. How do keep the spammers (real shitpost) from taking advantage of the reward pool?
properties (22)
authormengao
permlinkre-elmerlin-202351t173856202z
categorysharing
json_metadata{"tags":["sharing"],"app":"ecency/3.0.31-vision","format":"markdown+html"}
created2023-05-02 00:38:57
last_update2023-05-02 00:38:57
depth5
children1
last_payout2023-05-09 00:38:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length220
author_reputation116,787,713,430,440
root_title"Casual sharing and shitposts "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id123,072,590
net_rshares0
@elmerlin ·
$0.06
Spammers will get no reciprocal interaction with respect to the spam they push out. All of this will be pulled from on-chain. There's a lot of things you can learn from on-chain activity if you just frame it the right way, and apply the right kind of analysis. 

A web of trust is actually more of a qualitative exercise, because it's difficult to get very far if the accounts which validate *you*, are also of low quality. 
👍  
properties (23)
authorelmerlin
permlinkre-mengao-ru0acz
categorysharing
json_metadata{"tags":["sharing"],"app":"peakd/2023.4.2"}
created2023-05-02 00:50:57
last_update2023-05-02 00:50:57
depth6
children0
last_payout2023-05-09 00:50:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.030 HBD
curator_payout_value0.030 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length424
author_reputation22,327,748,464,574
root_title"Casual sharing and shitposts "
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id123,072,740
net_rshares116,105,601,515
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)