>Its like campaign finance reform. Everyone supports it. Later.

Except that we have actually been developing and spending money on it. This is just blatant disregard. Much of this information is available in GitHub. Thank you.

>Except that we have actually been developing and spending money on it.

on making the reward curve more linear?  How do you spend money on that... did you commission a study or something.

@smooth idk if they get paid by the hour or theyre salaried or what, but it seems to me (based on looking at github and also a couple of theoretical posts) that implementing the rsahres to vhares conversion is fairly modular like vote regeneration.  That is to say, there's a line that says something like vshares = rhsare ^2 and you change that line.

Looking at it, it seems like the reality is a bit more complicated.  But still all told youre talking about changing the variables in like a dozen lines of code.  How much of an money-investment is that really?  Especially if the devs are salaried (which you would think so, right?).   Enough to prove just by virtue of its magnitude that theyre serious about it, and not just floating it to appease the many people who want to see the change?

(fyi, looking at 913 which changed it back, cuz i know where that is, to figure out what changes it took).

> This is just blatant disregard

noticed this after the fact.... are you searching around for 'reckless disregard'  like in _times_... cause if so, LOL.

@sigmajin The developers who are working on the code are paid (I assume; no inside knowledge). It is fair to say 'spending money' when they are paid to develop code, which you can see in github.