RE: Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group by berniesanders

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @andrarchy/announcing-the-social-blockchain-working-group

socialblockchain · @berniesanders · Mar 13 '20 (edited)

$2.65

So, you basically announced an announcement?

Congrats, you've failed at your job on day 1.

https://media.giphy.com/media/gJhWzJzojndGjkDoEY/giphy.gif

👍 liondani, xxxxxxxxxx, ngc, z8teyb289qav9z, coininstant, netuoso, rndness222, ozchartart, sirvotesalot, joythewanderer, trumpman, berniesanders, abusereports, roundbeargames, lauch3d, joeypark, nextgencrypto, thecyclist, hungryharish, kirpy0x, azarmadr3, patrikcooper, jessicaalex
👎 marki99, atempt, slowgrow

`author`	berniesanders
`permlink`	q75e6p
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.2","image":["https://media.giphy.com/media/gJhWzJzojndGjkDoEY/giphy.gif"]}
`created`	2020-03-13 19:59:15
`last_update`	2020-03-13 20:26:21
`depth`	1
`children`	23
`last_payout`	2020-03-20 19:59:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	1.487 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	1.166 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	151
`author_reputation`	600,251,775,828,524
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,331,549
`net_rshares`	10,694,665,516,710
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (26)

voter	rshares	pct
berniesanders	120,365,940,129	10%
nextgencrypto	9,953,634,547	10%
liondani	4,659,281,462,982	100%
coininstant	368,076,895,288	66%
joythewanderer	156,689,306,674	27%
ozchartart	296,576,902,529	10%
thecyclist	9,733,917,203	10%
trumpman	123,176,159,490	32%
rndness222	322,932,695,263	100%
netuoso	325,736,559,819	100%
slowgrow	-345,550,968	-100%
ngc	441,833,800,480	10%
lauch3d	16,590,982,357	100%
sirvotesalot	236,994,961,077	10%
roundbeargames	17,095,078,131	100%
z8teyb289qav9z	438,765,555,705	10%
joeypark	10,398,565,612	100%
abusereports	41,087,821,140	10%
marki99	-901,797,957,668	-100%
atempt	-4,227,533,364	-100%
xxxxxxxxxx	3,992,491,183,200	100%
azarmadr3	1,420,466,293	100%
jessicaalex	10,873,658	100%
hungryharish	8,704,603,863	100%
patrikcooper	199,194,565	100%
kirpy0x	2,919,998,705	100%

@coininstant · Mar 14 '20 (edited)

Lol yeah, thanks for pointing that out! What a scam i invested in steemit and they pull this trick and now are like invest in our next one! I’m done investing in social media blockchains, too complicated for me!! Unless they gonna give me fork coins to move with, count me out!!

👍 lasseehlers, roundbeargames, mauialohabella, malia.mancianti, me-we

`author`	coininstant
`permlink`	q75egk
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
`created`	2020-03-13 20:05:09
`last_update`	2020-03-14 07:20:48
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2020-03-20 20:05:09
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	278
`author_reputation`	88,391,340,399,686
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,331,658
`net_rshares`	44,870,144,994
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (5)

voter	rshares	pct
lasseehlers	26,078,220,246	12%
me-we	468,959,189	100%
roundbeargames	16,558,777,163	100%
mauialohabella	1,111,186,003	29%
malia.mancianti	653,002,393	25%

@deniskj · Mar 13 '20

Bernie, why are you always pissed off??🙃🙃

properties (22)

@berniesanders · Mar 13 '20

$1.12

Eventually the full story will be told.

👍 xxxxxxxxxx, tuck-fheman, patrikcooper, jessicaalex

`author`	berniesanders
`permlink`	q75ixa
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
`created`	2020-03-13 21:41:36
`last_update`	2020-03-13 21:41:36
`depth`	3
`children`	6
`last_payout`	2020-03-20 21:41:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.562 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.561 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	39
`author_reputation`	600,251,775,828,524
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,333,292
`net_rshares`	4,332,620,700,597
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
tuck-fheman	4,184,071,953	100%
xxxxxxxxxx	4,328,246,358,498	100%
jessicaalex	6,986,832	100%
patrikcooper	183,283,314	100%

@nonameslefttouse · Mar 13 '20

$0.04

Did you just announce an announcement?

👍 carlgnash, r0nd0n, valued-customer, ammonite

`author`	nonameslefttouse
`permlink`	q75k7e
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
`created`	2020-03-13 22:09:21
`last_update`	2020-03-13 22:09:21
`depth`	4
`children`	5
`last_payout`	2020-03-20 22:09:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.020 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.019 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	38
`author_reputation`	593,361,688,458,528
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,333,804
`net_rshares`	206,662,612,058
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
r0nd0n	16,994,539,018	100%
valued-customer	14,465,837,210	25%
ammonite	8,399,352,175	15%
carlgnash	166,802,883,655	100%

5 replies

@phusionphil · Mar 13 '20

A partnership was announced, with all the discourse in the community, how can we judge them for appealing to their judgement?

properties (22)

@berniesanders · Mar 13 '20

$0.99

You find an announcement coming from the guy who did NOTHING but shill exactly what @ned told him to for the past 3+ years "appealing"?  That's fucking sad.

👍 xxxxxxxxxx, lauch3d, tuck-fheman, patrikcooper, jessicaalex
👎 atempt, slowgrow

`author`	berniesanders
`permlink`	q75g9s
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"users":["ned"],"app":"steemit/0.2"}
`created`	2020-03-13 20:44:18
`last_update`	2020-03-13 20:44:18
`depth`	3
`children`	8
`last_payout`	2020-03-20 20:44:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.492 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.493 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	156
`author_reputation`	600,251,775,828,524
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,332,273
`net_rshares`	4,090,229,786,180
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (7)

voter	rshares	pct
tuck-fheman	4,268,027,181	100%
slowgrow	-337,652,999	-100%
lauch3d	16,259,475,044	100%
atempt	-4,059,731,666	-100%
xxxxxxxxxx	4,073,893,861,682	100%
jessicaalex	10,037,068	100%
patrikcooper	195,769,870	100%

@geekgirl · Mar 13 '20

A bit too harsh...Ned has fooled everybody...well, except for you....but almost everybody.

👍 bidesign, shammi

`author`	geekgirl
`permlink`	q75h4j
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
`created`	2020-03-13 21:02:42
`last_update`	2020-03-13 21:02:42
`depth`	4
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2020-03-20 21:02:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	90
`author_reputation`	1,590,042,504,791,540
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,332,610
`net_rshares`	9,624,258,882
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
shammi	0 B		0	2%
bidesign	0 B		9,624,258,882	100%

4 replies

@phusionphil · Mar 13 '20

I am a casual steem user, I blog daily but I dont have time to follow what's going on with each witness personally.

Is there a certain post you think would convince me that this individual doesnt have the best interest of a decentralized social credit system like steem?

properties (22)

2 replies

@trumpman · Mar 13 '20 (edited)

$1.20

Clearly Justin taught them a thing..or two.

👍 liondani, enforcer48, roundbeargames

`author`	trumpman
`permlink`	q75j7u
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
`created`	2020-03-13 21:47:54
`last_update`	2020-03-13 21:50:06
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2020-03-20 21:47:54
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.602 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.602 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	43
`author_reputation`	2,480,990,116,394,740
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,333,408
`net_rshares`	4,604,130,503,016
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
liondani	4,567,849,452,438	100%
roundbeargames	16,227,220,671	100%
enforcer48	20,053,829,907	5%

@valued-customer · Mar 14 '20 (edited)

I see the developers that have the most, and most relevant, understanding of Steem code meeting regarding potential improvements to the code - just when Tron is forcing a fork - as extremely important, even existentially for the community.

Clearly, forking is necessarily on the table, and these guys putting their backs into that effort *when* it becomes necessary is going to be absolutely the best we can hope for in that circumstance.   

You seem to disagree.  What action would you recommend to enable the community to move forward in the various directions the current situation could go?

properties (22)

`author`	valued-customer
`permlink`	re-berniesanders-q75ywp
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["socialblockchain"],"app":"steempeak/2020.03.4"}
`created`	2020-03-14 03:27:12
`last_update`	2020-03-14 03:29:21
`depth`	2
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2020-03-21 03:27:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	598
`author_reputation`	359,636,729,487,523
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,338,540
`net_rshares`	0

@bobinson · Mar 14 '20 (edited)

This seems to be a long term plan. But the challenge that we are facing is an existential crisis of sorts and need a short term action plan and a long term vision. The word existential crisis is subjective and considers centralization of a public ledger as a (sybil) attack. Forking or otherwise (ie voting out the sybil-attackers) is required to re-establish the fact that Steem is a blockchain.

Right now Steem is a database and NOT a blockchain.

properties (22)

`author`	bobinson
`permlink`	q7666m
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
`created`	2020-03-14 06:04:00
`last_update`	2020-03-14 06:04:15
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2020-03-21 06:04:00
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	449
`author_reputation`	55,343,141,313,811
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,340,735
`net_rshares`	0

@andrarchy · Mar 14 '20

I agree and support short term efforts to establish a better chain for Steemians. Two groups can work on problems at the same time.

properties (22)

`author`	andrarchy
`permlink`	re-bobinson-q76uc8
`category`	socialblockchain
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["socialblockchain"],"app":"steempeak/2020.03.4"}
`created`	2020-03-14 14:45:45
`last_update`	2020-03-14 14:45:45
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2020-03-21 14:45:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	131
`author_reputation`	230,168,201,522,782
`root_title`	"Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	96,348,372
`net_rshares`	0