Viewing a response to: @znaffe/re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t212512672z
You think 10-20% is OK. Other are going to say anything over 0% is a crime. Some will say 50% is OK, others will believe higher. The solution is appeal to some higher power of central authority to dictate a best and final answer. Kinda not in the spirit of a decentralized platform. Or publish behavior and let the community decide what is acceptable, by ostracizing those that each individual wants to ostracize
| author | davebrewer |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-znaffe-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t222426759z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-23 22:24:27 |
| last_update | 2017-07-23 22:24:27 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 4 |
| last_payout | 2017-07-30 22:24:27 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.125 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.040 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 417 |
| author_reputation | 7,561,084,735,236 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,464,532 |
| net_rshares | 43,395,146,192 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| remlaps | 0 | 9,272,624,975 | 25% | ||
| futuristgear | 0 | 11,770,744,916 | 100% | ||
| thethreehugs | 0 | 61,598,125 | 100% | ||
| znaffe | 0 | 22,121,879,835 | 100% | ||
| zufrizal | 0 | 168,298,341 | 100% |
mmm Something to ponder about...my feelings is either you do or you don't..if the developers didn't want people upvoting themselves or only wanted a certain percentage of self votes, they should incorporate it into to the program. Just saying..
| author | thethreehugs |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-davebrewer-re-znaffe-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170723t233658311z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-23 23:37:00 |
| last_update | 2017-07-23 23:37:00 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-07-30 23:37:00 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 247 |
| author_reputation | 14,246,221,805,677 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,469,627 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
Well obviously it's subjective, I'm just stating my opinion. I personally believe that content should be able to speak for it self, but one of the main hurdles so far is how hard it is to find content. I do not want any central authority to dictate anything. I think the market will adjust with its own incentives and disincentives. It's a social platform after all, and social norms and 'rules' traditionally has more influence over people's decisions than actual laws and regulations.
| author | znaffe | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| permlink | re-davebrewer-2017724t0452442z | ||||||
| category | statistics | ||||||
| json_metadata | {"tags":"statistics","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"} | ||||||
| created | 2017-07-23 22:45:24 | ||||||
| last_update | 2017-07-23 22:45:24 | ||||||
| depth | 3 | ||||||
| children | 2 | ||||||
| last_payout | 2017-07-30 22:45:24 | ||||||
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 | ||||||
| total_payout_value | 0.722 HBD | ||||||
| curator_payout_value | 0.055 HBD | ||||||
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD | ||||||
| promoted | 0.000 HBD | ||||||
| body_length | 488 | ||||||
| author_reputation | 307,602,789,665 | ||||||
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" | ||||||
| beneficiaries |
| ||||||
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD | ||||||
| percent_hbd | 10,000 | ||||||
| post_id | 9,465,940 | ||||||
| net_rshares | 211,766,083,383 | ||||||
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| good-karma | 0 | 100,716,422,824 | 0.5% | ||
| bitcoiner | 0 | 3,365,195,683 | 0.5% | ||
| demo | 0 | 162,256,131 | 1% | ||
| feruz | 0 | 1,520,766,068 | 1% | ||
| esteemapp | 0 | 1,293,446,918 | 1% | ||
| madlenfox | 0 | 198,993,161 | 0.5% | ||
| bounties | 0 | 172,470,936 | 1% | ||
| steempoll | 0 | 167,417,700 | 1% | ||
| mikev | 0 | 102,398,548 | 0.5% | ||
| tipping | 0 | 152,150,091 | 1% | ||
| ophelion | 0 | 100,299,176 | 0.5% | ||
| davebrewer | 0 | 102,359,990,301 | 13% | ||
| katsics | 0 | 1,285,977,505 | 100% | ||
| zufrizal | 0 | 168,298,341 | 100% |
So I read your response as - people can upvote themselves if they want, and the market will adjust incentives if they believe that person is being greedy and abusing the system. Sounds right to me
| author | davebrewer |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-znaffe-re-davebrewer-2017724t0452442z-20170724t024751165z |
| category | statistics |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-07-24 02:47:51 |
| last_update | 2017-07-24 02:47:51 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2017-07-31 02:47:51 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 197 |
| author_reputation | 7,561,084,735,236 |
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 9,482,899 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
Yepp, basically. Thus post is a good example of the market reacting
| author | znaffe | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| permlink | re-davebrewer-2017724t81215565z | ||||||
| category | statistics | ||||||
| json_metadata | {"tags":"statistics","app":"esteem/1.4.6","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem"} | ||||||
| created | 2017-07-24 06:12:15 | ||||||
| last_update | 2017-07-24 06:12:15 | ||||||
| depth | 5 | ||||||
| children | 0 | ||||||
| last_payout | 2017-07-31 06:12:15 | ||||||
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 | ||||||
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD | ||||||
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD | ||||||
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD | ||||||
| promoted | 0.000 HBD | ||||||
| body_length | 67 | ||||||
| author_reputation | 307,602,789,665 | ||||||
| root_title | "Self-voting user list since HF19" | ||||||
| beneficiaries |
| ||||||
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD | ||||||
| percent_hbd | 10,000 | ||||||
| post_id | 9,497,707 | ||||||
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks