create account

RE: Self-voting user list since HF19 by jacksonoskele

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @calamus056/self-voting-user-list-since-hf19

· @jacksonoskele ·
My question is, it is bad to vote for yourself? If it is then why did the community allow it?
properties (22)
authorjacksonoskele
permlinkre-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t074920603z
categorystatistics
json_metadata{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-24 07:49:33
last_update2017-07-24 07:49:33
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-07-31 07:49:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length93
author_reputation1,315,666,699,750
root_title"Self-voting user list since HF19"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id9,504,742
net_rshares0
@calamus056 ·
Because the vast majority of people had no power before June 20th and didn't notice the problem. Now everyone know about it and people finally realize it's a problem. People are mainly against self-voting spam comments.
properties (22)
authorcalamus056
permlinkre-jacksonoskele-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170724t080413079z
categorystatistics
json_metadata{"tags":["statistics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-24 08:04:54
last_update2017-07-24 08:04:54
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-07-31 08:04:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length219
author_reputation5,645,464,390,253
root_title"Self-voting user list since HF19"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id9,505,811
net_rshares0
@elfspice ·
The majority of the community is probably against it, in terms of numbers. The numbers, in terms of stake, are a whole different story. And, as https://steemit.com/steemit/@calamus056/self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-part-3-potential-comment-abuse shows, it's nearly 1/3 of the rewards pool going to this.

As calamus points out, and as I said early on when I started commenting on the subject, before HF19, only whales could substantially self vote.

As for 'the community', that's irrelevant. Stake is everything. The stake controls the witnesses, and the Github 'issues'. They arbitrarily define changes that relate to game-rules as 'feature requests' and define them as unacceptable and will ban you if you try to submit more than a few such issues.

I doubt that Stinc is ever going to change it. Not before they have had their fun milking the rest of the pool and diluting all the investors' holdings. Of course, they still don't have enough. Especially not @dan larimer, who also just creamed several million with the EOS ICO. Never enough for these people. It's on account of people like this that I like to believe in Hell.
properties (22)
authorelfspice
permlinkre-jacksonoskele-re-calamus056-self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-20170728t145335207z
categorystatistics
json_metadata{"tags":["statistics"],"users":["dan"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@calamus056/self-voting-user-list-since-hf19-part-3-potential-comment-abuse"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-28 14:53:36
last_update2017-07-28 14:53:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-08-04 14:53:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,132
author_reputation-3,995,561,637,087
root_title"Self-voting user list since HF19"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id10,027,466
net_rshares0