Viewing a response to: @jaki01/proof-of-brain-proof-of-popularity
People who are famous for BIG SP meet the trending post. Difficult to find variations of posts with ordinary users. In various tribes, I have also seen the contents of trending posts made popular by curators and other famous people. Sometimes I feel surrendered to post good content because there are no "big users" who care about my posts. Through @Curangel I tried to vote for users who had not been explored well in Steem. I see many old users on Steem that can't earn more than 1 Steem, even with good content.
| author | anggreklestari |
|---|---|
| permlink | py5zn2 |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"users":["curangel"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-09-21 04:40:21 |
| last_update | 2019-09-21 04:40:21 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 4 |
| last_payout | 2019-09-28 04:40:21 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.019 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.018 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 517 |
| author_reputation | 1,895,587,017,213,108 |
| root_title | "Proof of Brain? 'Proof of Popularity'!" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 90,781,487 |
| net_rshares | 182,711,782,976 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| jaki01 | 0 | 170,117,022,879 | 6% | ||
| hdu | 0 | 4,023,463,175 | 0.91% | ||
| delabo | 0 | 8,571,296,922 | 3% |
> I see many old users on Steem that can't earn more than 1 Steem, even with good content. Exactly! > Sometimes I feel surrendered to post good content because there are no "big users" who care about my posts. Don't surrender, please! :)
| author | jaki01 |
|---|---|
| permlink | py6700 |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-09-21 07:19:12 |
| last_update | 2019-09-21 07:19:12 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 3 |
| last_payout | 2019-09-28 07:19:12 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 240 |
| author_reputation | 542,605,240,265,605 |
| root_title | "Proof of Brain? 'Proof of Popularity'!" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 90,784,163 |
| net_rshares | 12,604,745,695 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hdu | 0 | 4,050,451,579 | 0.91% | ||
| delabo | 0 | 8,554,294,116 | 3% |
Although a good content is very subjective, I still think small stake users who write mundane topics should be highlighted as well. However with curation projects, there are criteria that have to be met, hence why, it's really tricky to catch all the good *fish* in the net. I am still positive that at least users who consistently write a decent to great content, definitely attracts curators and *big* users.
| author | macchiata |
|---|---|
| permlink | py6t0q |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-09-21 15:14:54 |
| last_update | 2019-09-21 15:14:54 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 2 |
| last_payout | 2019-09-28 15:14:54 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 411 |
| author_reputation | 1,401,177,844,500,753 |
| root_title | "Proof of Brain? 'Proof of Popularity'!" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 90,793,705 |
| net_rshares | 88,407,369,932 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| jaki01 | 0 | 88,407,369,932 | 3% |
> Although a good content is very subjective ... Partly subjective. There <em>are</em> certain criteria helping to evaluate the quality of content, for example: - Are orthography and grammar correct? - How is the quality of included pictures and videos (that's measurable)? - Does the author offer verifiable sources to back his claims? - Does a post contain explanations, own thoughts, new ideas? Curation projects have good intentions (and partly positive effects), but the trend of making whitelists with 'trustable' authors involves the risk to upvote certain users rather often, whereas others get nearly nothing. Actually, I think one should try to spread one's upvotes on as many different users as possible and evaluate <em>content</em> independantly of <em>who</em> created it. > I am still positive ... Nice, lets hope together that in the end that turns out to be justified. :)
| author | jaki01 |
|---|---|
| permlink | py6u82 |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-09-21 15:40:51 |
| last_update | 2019-09-21 15:40:51 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2019-09-28 15:40:51 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.548 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.548 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 892 |
| author_reputation | 542,605,240,265,605 |
| root_title | "Proof of Brain? 'Proof of Popularity'!" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 90,794,424 |
| net_rshares | 3,974,067,051,224 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| macchiata | 0 | 20,179,716,023 | 100% | ||
| wherein | 0 | 3,953,887,335,201 | 100% |
hiveblocks