RE: People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards by anonymint

steem · @anonymint · Aug 11 '16 (edited)

> People are voting on "sure shots" for the sake of curation rewards.

Agreed, [I explain it as discouraging organic engagement](https://steemit.com/steem/@anonymint/blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed#@anonymint/re-anonymint-re-nanzo-scoop-re-anonymint-re-nanzo-scoop-re-anonymint-blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed-20160811t042858237z).

> As far as I'm concerned, this is one of the most pressing issues on the platform right now because the current paradigm is so extremely polarising.

Agreed it is overwhelming any incentives to form diverse communities, which I explained in more detail at my above linked comment post.

properties (22)

`author`	anonymint
`permlink`	re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t054434439z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@anonymint/blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed#@anonymint/re-anonymint-re-nanzo-scoop-re-anonymint-re-nanzo-scoop-re-anonymint-blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed-20160811t042858237z"]}
`created`	2016-08-11 05:44:30
`last_update`	2016-08-11 05:45:42
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-09-10 19:32:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	637
`author_reputation`	28,085,935,540,836
`root_title`	"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	740,535
`net_rshares`	0