create account

RE: People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards by anonymint

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @mrosenquist/re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t041355797z

· @anonymint · (edited)
> he biggest and most un-resolvable problem will be in the inherent structure it will establish, which will be reinforced by expected self-serving behaviors....

> This model, as I think your describe it, basically sets in motion the creation of dynasty's

I am not sure if it is the biggest vulnerability, as I explained another one in my comments, but I agree this could be a degenerate outcome. Afaics, we would incentivize a top-down rigid structure, which I also mentioned in my longish comment post.

Btw, I didn't upvote for your algorithm suggestion, which sounds to me like probably not correct.
properties (22)
authoranonymint
permlinkre-mrosenquist-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t065911879z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-11 06:59:06
last_update2016-08-11 07:02:36
depth2
children2
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length604
author_reputation28,085,935,540,836
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id741,192
net_rshares0
@mrosenquist ·
In all fairness, I have yet to outline the application of any algorithm.  I was just validating the goals and limiting parameters to the problem (technical, behavioral, and process).  If you really want to know how I think the system can be modified to attain all the goals I stated (assumed), let me know.  I can produce a strategic framework for review.

...and don't worry about not upvoting.  Only vote for things you respect or agree with.  :)
properties (22)
authormrosenquist
permlinkre-anonymint-re-mrosenquist-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t075438689z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-11 07:54:42
last_update2016-08-11 07:54:42
depth3
children1
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length448
author_reputation178,878,611,908,167
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id741,672
net_rshares0
@anonymint ·
I did upvote. I just meant my upvote was for the part I responded to. Thanks.
properties (22)
authoranonymint
permlinkre-mrosenquist-re-anonymint-re-mrosenquist-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t100724628z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-11 10:07:18
last_update2016-08-11 10:07:18
depth4
children0
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length77
author_reputation28,085,935,540,836
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id742,800
net_rshares0