Viewing a response to: @tombstone/re-anonymint-blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed-20160810t160545453z
The most salient (mathematically accurate) response I can think of at the moment, is level at which thresholded rewards such that the vulnerability would become enabled. See my reply to AlexGR. In other words, the whales must remain in control.
| author | anonymint |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-tombstone-re-anonymint-blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed-20160810t161236295z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-08-10 16:12:30 |
| last_update | 2016-08-10 16:13:00 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-10 09:37:03 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 245 |
| author_reputation | 28,085,935,540,836 |
| root_title | "Blog rewards CAN’T be widely distributed" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 727,082 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks