create account

RE: Blog rewards CAN’T be widely distributed by anonymint

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @zer0sum/re-anonymint-blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed-20160810t194656232z

· @anonymint · (edited)
I had seen allusions to Dan's use of that term. Haha, I think he got that subconsciously from me, as I had so often referred to [Bitcoin as a Trojan Horse of the DEEP STATE](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=160612.0) since 2013, and he has turned it around to have a positive meaning. I am just joking about him getting it from me, but I was known to be the one heavily using that term at Bitcointalk.

Of course most of us understand the motivation to move away from spamming ourselves with ads.

And the greater incentive for mankind is to stop the sort of censorship and theft of followers that the behemoth social networks are doing (see my comment reply to @spookypooky below).

As for professional bloggers, I think it is all about building community and monetizing the community. Ads are a form of that but they have low relevance which is why we find them spammy.

Thus intuitively I don't expect a globalized monetization to be conceptually correct. One of the differences between the design instincts of Dan and myself, has always been that I am looking for degrees-of-freedom and (at least in the past) he was trying to design in some globalized interest rate and collectivized monetary aspects. This was one of the key differences I observed between our thought processes when he and I used to discuss before he left Bitcointalk for his Bitshare forum. However, I also see he has innovated in ways that are insightful. I am thinking the globalized debasement can be used with some localized community degree-of-freedom, but I haven't yet worked out exactly how to do this. I am still in analysis mode.

Btw, this system is a tremendous accomplishment. A lot of development effort in this and an ecosystem with a lot of people contributing. Kudos.

This experiment is providing much data and a testbed for increasing our understanding; and is causing a lot of brainstorming in our cryptocommunity.

Edit: note [I have replied](https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards#@anonymint/re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t031807328z) to Dan's latest blog proposal.
properties (22)
authoranonymint
permlinkre-zer0sum-re-anonymint-blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed-20160811t023656175z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=160612.0"],"users":["spookypooky"]}
created2016-08-11 02:36:51
last_update2016-08-11 04:13:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-09-10 09:37:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,197
author_reputation28,085,935,540,836
root_title"Blog rewards CAN’T be widely distributed"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id738,333
net_rshares0