RE: People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards by ash

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dantheman/people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards

steem · @ash · Aug 11 '16

$6.38

side note: Google got rid of pagerank.

👍 smooth, liondani, smooth.witness, ash, anonymint

`author`	ash
`permlink`	re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t061833339z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-08-11 06:18:33
`last_update`	2016-08-11 06:18:33
`depth`	1
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2016-09-10 19:32:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	4.788 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	1.589 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	38
`author_reputation`	286,803,743,324,398
`root_title`	"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	740,842
`net_rshares`	4,312,955,500,349
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (5)

voter	rshares	pct
smooth	2,597,108,706,450	10%
liondani	902,330,119,098	100%
smooth.witness	420,812,233,580	10%
ash	350,738,138,668	100%
anonymint	41,966,302,553	100%

@fiserman · Feb 10 '20

Probably a bit late, but [pagerank](http://dotcomwriters.com) still exists but it's not public anymore. This is why people use third party metrics to measure a page value.

properties (22)

`author`	fiserman
`permlink`	q5h9l7
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"links":["http://dotcomwriters.com"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2020-02-10 05:43:57
`last_update`	2020-02-10 05:43:57
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2020-02-17 05:43:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	171
`author_reputation`	33,332,677,735,741
`root_title`	"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	95,278,258
`net_rshares`	0

@smooth · Aug 11 '16 (edited)

$0.27

Upvoted for relevance. I don't know the history here, but before undertaking to emulate something it should be clearly understand what challenges it has encountered in a possibly-similar adversarial environment, what replaced it, and why.

👍 ash

`author`	smooth
`permlink`	re-ash-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t071616300z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-08-11 07:16:18
`last_update`	2016-08-11 07:16:27
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-09-10 19:32:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.200 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.065 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	238
`author_reputation`	253,602,537,834,068
`root_title`	"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	741,348
`net_rshares`	343,860,920,263
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
ash	0 B		343,860,920,263	100%

@anonymint · Aug 11 '16

+1 Ditto why I had upvoted. Although @dantheman mentioned it in the blog, I upvoted this comment for the same reason you did, that we shouldn't readily think SP solves all the reasons Google abandoned it.

properties (22)