RE: Steem 0.17 Change Proposal Introduction by beanz

witnesses

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

steem · @beanz · Jan 10 '17

It would probably be simpler to just be required to use your active key to edit posts that have passed their payout.

`author`	beanz
`permlink`	re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-steem-0-17-change-proposal-introduction-20170110t215704880z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2017-01-10 21:57:09
`last_update`	2017-01-10 21:57:09
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-02-10 22:33:00
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	116
`author_reputation`	77,215,574,122,930
`root_title`	"Steem 0.17 Change Proposal Introduction"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	2,215,704
`net_rshares`	82,786,914,890
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
beanz	0 B		48,826,545,293	100%
timcliff	0 B		33,960,369,597	25%

It would be simpler but the idea of a switch comes from the idea of segregating the active key from any place where user-editable content is located.

`author`	pfunk
`permlink`	re-beanz-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-steem-0-17-change-proposal-introduction-20170110t220534093z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2017-01-10 22:05:39
`last_update`	2017-01-10 22:05:39
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-02-10 22:33:00
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	149
`author_reputation`	221,632,045,904,452
`root_title`	"Steem 0.17 Change Proposal Introduction"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	2,215,769
`net_rshares`	0

Help/Feedback