Viewing a response to: @superfreek/re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t034647042z
I think if you look at a site like google it is more difficult to game than a site like reditt. Granted they are two different beasts, but the more features that limit the amount of abuse of the system the better. If it doesn't work, it can always be returned to the way it was before.
| author | bendjmiller222 |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-superfreek-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t042920347z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-08-11 04:29:24 |
| last_update | 2016-08-11 04:29:24 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 285 |
| author_reputation | 24,513,111,975,788 |
| root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 739,684 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks