create account

RE: People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards by biophil

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @smooth/re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t091801500z

· @biophil ·
$0.07
People not understanding the curation rewards is a very simple UI problem. It would be trivial to add an indicator by the upvote button that gives you information about what sort of reward might be possible for your vote. "Percentage of curation rewards remaining" or something like that. This would help people understand how curation rewards work. Their confusion is understandable for two reasons: 
1. AFAIK the only public resource explaining them is the whitepaper and steem.io, which are both completely wrong; 
2. the actual implementation (with the (B+v)/(s+v) formula) can't be understood without a ton of work reading the code, running simulations, and really getting down into the guts of it.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorbiophil
permlinkre-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t173538405z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-11 17:35:39
last_update2016-08-11 17:35:39
depth3
children4
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.062 HBD
curator_payout_value0.012 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length703
author_reputation45,223,914,794,461
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id749,073
net_rshares104,207,440,051
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@anonymint ·
> People not understanding the curation rewards is a very simple UI problem.

Lol, I can see you are not an experienced developer. No offense. But that would lead to all sorts of misunderstandings.
properties (22)
authoranonymint
permlinkre-biophil-re-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160812t201116007z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-12 20:11:09
last_update2016-08-12 20:11:09
depth4
children2
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length197
author_reputation28,085,935,540,836
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id771,266
net_rshares0
@anonymint ·
@biophil, I am very very sleepy so this reply may not be so great. In short, the masses won't ever understand it, the cognitive load is too high. K.I.S.S.
properties (22)
authoranonymint
permlinkre-anonymint-re-biophil-re-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160812t220939523z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["biophil"]}
created2016-08-12 22:09:33
last_update2016-08-12 22:09:33
depth5
children0
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length154
author_reputation28,085,935,540,836
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id773,343
net_rshares0
@biophil ·
Haha, it's true - I'm not a developer.

But the opacity of the current interface is already leading to all sorts of misunderstandings. It's also leading to people "wasting" their votes on trending articles. I don't know, maybe that's the point.

What are the misunderstandings that would be so egregious?
properties (22)
authorbiophil
permlinkre-anonymint-re-biophil-re-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160812t211032680z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-12 21:10:33
last_update2016-08-12 21:10:33
depth5
children0
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length304
author_reputation45,223,914,794,461
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id772,342
net_rshares0
@doctorstrange ·
Agreed. It would seem that the devs have a habit of thinking everyone understands this system as well as they do. That isn't a slam, I think it is valid criticism and something that all of us are guilty of. Doctors are notorious for using jargon and talking over the heads of patients and this is something I know from first hand experience and takes constant concerted effort to improve.

Anyway, you make good points. We are in beta and I can only assume that the UI will get a dedicated team to deal with making it more new user friendly. If we are to get many new users here, and keep them, this will surely need to be addressed.
properties (22)
authordoctorstrange
permlinkre-biophil-re-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t235014391z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-11 23:50:24
last_update2016-08-11 23:50:24
depth4
children0
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length633
author_reputation1,427,129,439,845
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id755,631
net_rshares0