create account

RE: Diversifying Curation Reward by clayop

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @recursive/re-clayop-re-recursive-re-clayop-re-recursive-re-clayop-diversifying-curation-reward-20170223t100129766z

· @clayop ·
$0.02
Thanks for your points and I agree many of them you made. But I think debates  on bot is not a main issue (not even in the title) regardless of their smartness or dumbness. The point is design of incentives.

Numbers can be inaccurate, but for example Steem is giving 0% to whom don't vote and 1~5% ROI to those who vote. So voting is always more profitable than not voting. Rewarding on participation seems good, however, there is no alternative to keep profit other than vote.

The incentive system what I try to design is like this. Steem Power basically has fixed ROI of 2%. If you vote, you will get between 1~5% based on your voting performance instead of fixed 2%. If one is very confident to vote well, s/he will dive into the voting game, but if one prefer more stable income s/he will stay on 2%. That's my main idea of ***diversifying*** rewards.

Regarding this, I wish steemit accounts are excluded from fixed income as well as curation rewards because they are not an investor.
👍  
properties (23)
authorclayop
permlinkre-recursive-re-clayop-re-recursive-re-clayop-re-recursive-re-clayop-diversifying-curation-reward-20170224t001052441z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-24 00:10:54
last_update2017-02-24 00:10:54
depth6
children0
last_payout2017-03-25 19:00:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.018 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length991
author_reputation270,845,899,918,618
root_title"Diversifying Curation Reward"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,578,878
net_rshares52,289,903,051
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)