create account

RE: People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards by clevecross

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @smooth/re-doctorstrange-re-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t105033100z

· @clevecross ·
I agree, vote should reward. If you don't feel it is worth the vote, you can comment. It promotes the posts visibility still and helps in a back end way. Flagging should have a tiered options as to reason (all with same penalty) but clarity as to why it was downvoted. Also, what would you think of whales using algo to designate small small amounts f voting power based on historical upvotes lining up with point of views per whale? I am sure there's logistics I have not realized or thought through as yet on that... but it's a thought
properties (22)
authorclevecross
permlinkre-smooth-re-doctorstrange-re-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t162541788z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-11 16:25:42
last_update2016-08-11 16:25:42
depth5
children0
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length537
author_reputation7,635,074,529,912
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id747,943
net_rshares0