Viewing a response to: @smooth/re-doctorstrange-re-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t105033100z
I agree, vote should reward. If you don't feel it is worth the vote, you can comment. It promotes the posts visibility still and helps in a back end way. Flagging should have a tiered options as to reason (all with same penalty) but clarity as to why it was downvoted. Also, what would you think of whales using algo to designate small small amounts f voting power based on historical upvotes lining up with point of views per whale? I am sure there's logistics I have not realized or thought through as yet on that... but it's a thought
author | clevecross |
---|---|
permlink | re-smooth-re-doctorstrange-re-smooth-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t162541788z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 16:25:42 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 16:25:42 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 537 |
author_reputation | 7,635,074,529,912 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 747,943 |
net_rshares | 0 |