Viewing a response to: @mindtrap/thoughts-about-redistribution
Greetings dear friend @mindtrap I agree with you when you say that HF is about better distribution. Obviously you refer to the new 50% / 50%. This new aspect was not received positively when it was announced before the HF. But the positive results have managed to reverse this opinion. > Better curation rewards for everyone, less abuse, better author rewards for those that maintain a standard / decent quality on their posts etc. Certainly manual upvoting have increased. This is benefiting both authors and curators. I think this is the goal, well thought out! SP holders must use it, use it constantly. Search quality publications and to cure. *We must distribute better*. That would be our new role in this game called Steemit. All best, Piotr.
author | crypto.piotr |
---|---|
permlink | pyefp0 |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"users":["mindtrap"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-09-25 17:35:18 |
last_update | 2019-09-25 17:35:18 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-10-02 17:35:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 755 |
author_reputation | 27,396,789,428,606 |
root_title | "Thoughts about...redistribution. Could it work?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 90,937,887 |
net_rshares | 0 |