RE: Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives by dantheman

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @ats-david/re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t163648558z

steem · @dantheman · Nov 18 '16

Assuming a fixed market cap, an increase in competition will result in lower average rewards.  The most popular content will still command a relatively hefty reward.

The scenario where the market cap remains flat but our user base grows 100x is one that I consider unlikely.  Knowing how markets work, it wouldn't surprise me in the least to see a 100x growth in user activity result in a 500x growth in market cap.  

To put it in perspective, if every bitcoin transaction represented 1 user, there there is currently an average of 250,000 daily users of BTC.   That means BTC has 78x the number of daily users and only 40x the number of weekly users.  In this situation we see that bitcoin has 600x the market cap.

👍 dwinblood, matrixdweller, thecryptofiend, jaredandanissa, ats-david, littlescribe, johnathanhenry

`author`	dantheman
`permlink`	re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t164737682z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 16:47:36
`last_update`	2016-11-18 16:47:36
`depth`	2
`children`	5
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 18:20:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	717
`author_reputation`	240,292,002,602,347
`root_title`	"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,796,186
`net_rshares`	56,460,163,164
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (7)

voter	rshares	pct
thecryptofiend	11,363,763,418	1%
dwinblood	21,655,247,653	33%
matrixdweller	20,529,304,639	100%
ats-david	1,231,640,529	1%
jaredandanissa	1,427,679,760	100%
littlescribe	179,845,437	1%
johnathanhenry	72,681,728	76%

@ats-david · Nov 18 '16

So, do you believe that the inflation rate is mostly irrelevant to scalability then? What I understand is that the market cap may rise and the price of Steem may rise, but the number of Steem in circulation may not increase proportionally. Wouldn't this mean that authors and curators will get higher value in rewards per unit, but the number of units would be limited - less overall users would be receiving rewards. Is that right?

👍 thecryptofiend

`author`	ats-david
`permlink`	re-dantheman-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t170703857z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 17:07:03
`last_update`	2016-11-18 17:07:03
`depth`	3
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 18:20:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	432
`author_reputation`	324,017,334,201,433
`root_title`	"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,796,298
`net_rshares`	11,363,763,418
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
thecryptofiend	0 B		11,363,763,418	1%

@dantheman · Nov 18 '16

STEEM is very divisible, so more overall users would be receiving rewards.  Each reward would comprise of less STEEM but the STEEM would be worth more.

👍 matrixdweller, thecryptofiend, cmtzco, steemitfaucet, jaredandanissa, jasen.g1311, johnathanhenry

`author`	dantheman
`permlink`	re-ats-david-re-dantheman-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t173125536z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 17:31:24
`last_update`	2016-11-18 17:31:24
`depth`	4
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 18:20:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	151
`author_reputation`	240,292,002,602,347
`root_title`	"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,796,451
`net_rshares`	45,431,771,391
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (7)

voter	rshares	pct
thecryptofiend	11,363,763,418	1%
cmtzco	9,566,565,658	100%
jasen.g1311	230,824,651	100%
matrixdweller	20,529,304,639	100%
jaredandanissa	1,427,679,760	100%
steemitfaucet	2,240,951,537	100%
johnathanhenry	72,681,728	76%

@ats-david · Nov 18 '16

Ah, yes.  You're right.  I was thinking about it on a whole unit, vote, and dollar basis. The divisibility is obvious and I can't believe I overlooked that.  Sorry for inadvertently wasting your time, but thank you for responding.

👍 thecryptofiend

`author`	ats-david
`permlink`	re-dantheman-re-ats-david-re-dantheman-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t174347538z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 17:43:48
`last_update`	2016-11-18 17:43:48
`depth`	5
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 18:20:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	230
`author_reputation`	324,017,334,201,433
`root_title`	"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,796,540
`net_rshares`	11,363,763,418
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
thecryptofiend	0 B		11,363,763,418	1%

@bryan-imhoff · Nov 18 '16

I've been very curious about this. How many places does the block chain calculate out to currently and is that expandable as prices rise? I see more SP decimal places on some third party interfaces that don't show on the current site. 
I feel that minnows even now should be rewarded in whatever small fraction of SP they earn from rewards, even if it doesn't meet a .01 payout threshold. Seeing progress is important for user retention, and would frame rewards as more of a points system redeemable for currency, fostering a more long term - less immediate mindset.

properties (22)

`author`	bryan-imhoff
`permlink`	re-dantheman-re-ats-david-re-dantheman-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t220228101z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 22:02:27
`last_update`	2016-11-18 22:02:27
`depth`	5
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 18:20:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	566
`author_reputation`	71,780,425,099,152
`root_title`	"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,798,170
`net_rshares`	0

1 reply