Viewing a response to: @thedashguy/re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t023639684z
I think you should get more curation rewards for voting something that is not expected to do well but does( value investing in my field) For instance if a poster averages 5c a post and then nails it , the curation rewards should be higher for the value of post above 5c ( or Lower if under 5c) This encourages posters to read, consider if this is really good and not just reward posters with good track record. Maybe it's a 25% bonus or penalty for voters in first 30minutes on all value above the average. The later voters would be he source of this reward.
author | dennygalindo |
---|---|
permlink | re-thedashguy-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t031251299z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 03:12:51 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 03:12:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.594 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.193 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 563 |
author_reputation | 6,552,498,469,686 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 738,797 |
net_rshares | 905,883,579,841 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
liondani | 0 | 902,312,378,841 | 100% | ||
dennygalindo | 0 | 3,571,201,000 | 100% |
Although this idea seems really great at the surface, it has deep Sybil attack vulnerabilities and be gamed to destroy the system. This is why non-experts are not allowed to design the system. But thanks for sharing your idea any way. Open source is that maybe via enough sharing of ideas, we can happenstance on a winning one.
author | anonymint |
---|---|
permlink | re-dennygalindo-re-thedashguy-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t060540176z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 06:05:36 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 06:06:57 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 328 |
author_reputation | 28,085,935,540,836 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 740,742 |
net_rshares | 924,511,286 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
doctorstrange | 0 | 924,511,286 | 100% |
I like that idea, because you are using the same amount of voting % whether you are voting on a new posters content, or a veterans content.
author | bendjmiller222 |
---|---|
permlink | re-dennygalindo-re-thedashguy-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t033834353z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 03:38:36 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 03:38:36 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 139 |
author_reputation | 24,513,111,975,788 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 739,112 |
net_rshares | 0 |