create account

RE: HF20 Update: Restoring Continuity by fitbusinessman

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dailyopinion/re-indigoocean-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-restoring-continuity-20180930t185210374z

· @fitbusinessman · (edited)
@dailyopinion primarily bots that attempt to police the platform like @steemcleaners. Not only are they completely dishonest, but they fail to realize that decentralization or even separation from the mainstream social bullshit has the initial foundation of NOT wanting to be policed. 

Let the community decide the content they would like to see! These idiots develop cartels using delegated Steem and attempt to impose their authoritarian power over minnows, which definitely keeps the platform from growing. 

Case-in-point: They use robot software to attempt finding content dupes across the net without ever considering who the main content dev was. Posting earlier on the net does not mean that you originated the content. Especially in cases of purposeful syndication or curation!
👎  
properties (23)
authorfitbusinessman
permlinkre-dailyopinion-re-indigoocean-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-restoring-continuity-20181001t011808359z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["dailyopinion","steemcleaners"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-10-01 01:18:09
last_update2018-10-01 01:19:00
depth3
children1
last_payout2018-10-08 01:18:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length787
author_reputation5,414,597,988,616
root_title"HF20 Update: Restoring Continuity"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id72,383,162
net_rshares-277,643,935
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@dailyopinion ·
My educated guess is that things like @steemcleaners will have plenty of RC to continue operating normally - especially them based on the amount of SP in the account and the large delegation.

In my opinion - leaving an automated comment on someone's post letting people know that the article posted may (or may not) be plagiarized is not a terrible idea, as long as not more than one service is doing such a thing.

It may already do this, but if it doesn't it should probably scan the post for words like "This is not my work" or "I'm sharing this" or something, because sometimes it's totally appropriate to share others content - it is nice to know if the author is really the author though or if they wanted to just share something as people often do on social networks.

The blockchain does let the community decide what they'd like to see, or at least what they would like to make less visible through the use of downvotes. This is the built in blockchain mechanism to allow the community to decide what gets seen or not seen.

Either way, I believe spammy/scammy bots will be a lot less common around here.
properties (22)
authordailyopinion
permlinkre-fitbusinessman-re-dailyopinion-re-indigoocean-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-restoring-continuity-20181001t015543562z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["steemcleaners"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-10-01 01:55:45
last_update2018-10-01 01:55:45
depth4
children0
last_payout2018-10-08 01:55:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,114
author_reputation1,024,250,409,808
root_title"HF20 Update: Restoring Continuity"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id72,384,459
net_rshares0