RE: Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal by holybranches

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @whatsup/re-steemitblog-improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal-20190516t183945970z

steem · @holybranches · May 16 '19

$0.50

Anyone that weighs in on this post without actually digesting @vandeberg's latest post might be making a huge mistake.

>We cannot eliminate such behavior entirely, but we can make it less economically viable.

This is the whole argument. I'm curious to what you really think of it. And no, not if Traf and his likes will profit or not.

👍 justinw, trafalgar, therealwolf, whatsup, valued-customer, ascorphat

`author`	holybranches
`permlink`	re-whatsup-re-steemitblog-improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal-20190516t220211138z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steempeak/1.9.9"}
`created`	2019-05-16 22:02:48
`last_update`	2019-05-16 22:02:48
`depth`	2
`children`	6
`last_payout`	2019-05-23 22:02:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.394 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.103 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	337
`author_reputation`	8,432,821,397,316
`root_title`	"Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	84,991,552
`net_rshares`	955,143,737,525
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (6)

voter	rshares	pct
whatsup	60,245,398,698	17%
justinw	407,402,213,240	100%
trafalgar	337,764,874,674	1%
valued-customer	8,771,416,812	25%
therealwolf	140,728,638,502	6%
ascorphat	231,195,599	2.5%

@trafalgar · May 17 '19

Traf doesn't want the vast majority of active stake taking part in mindless self voting or vote selling just to get staking returns, because that's seen as the norm now.

Traf can't afford/is unwilling to not do this to defend his own stake, but would much prefer a system where everyone is incentivized to act honestly with respect to voting behavior.

That's what these suggestions are designed to do

👍 trafalgar, novacadian, yourmaker, igster
👎 realcleaner

`author`	trafalgar
`permlink`	re-holybranches-re-whatsup-re-steemitblog-improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal-20190517t034101672z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-05-17 03:41:06
`last_update`	2019-05-17 03:41:06
`depth`	3
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2019-05-24 03:41:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	402
`author_reputation`	196,449,472,677,173
`root_title`	"Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	85,003,510
`net_rshares`	18,545,291,242
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (5)

voter	rshares	pct
igster	247,224,902	1%
novacadian	50,420,820,999	25%
trafalgar	337,704,476,796	1%
yourmaker	13,745,977,067	65.9%
realcleaner	-383,573,208,522	-20.31%

@valued-customer · May 17 '19

These proposals do not eliminate incentive to extract rewards from corrupting curation at all.  They only tweak the returns a little.

Those incentives can - and should be - eliminated altogether.

👍 kerrywolf
👎 iflagtrash

`author`	valued-customer
`permlink`	re-trafalgar-re-holybranches-re-whatsup-re-steemitblog-improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal-20190517t173506016z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steempeak/1.9.9"}
`created`	2019-05-17 17:35:12
`last_update`	2019-05-17 17:35:12
`depth`	4
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2019-05-24 17:35:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	196
`author_reputation`	363,818,997,826,539
`root_title`	"Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	85,038,937
`net_rshares`	32,441,370,485
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
iflagtrash	0 B		-39,108,780,079	-10%
kerrywolf	0 B		71,550,150,564	29.65%

@iflagtrash · May 17 '19

I flag trash.  You have received a flag.

👍 sirvotesalot, stimialiti
👎 realcleaner

`author`	iflagtrash
`permlink`	iflagtrash-re-valued-customerre-trafalgar-re-holybranches-re-whatsup-re-steemitblog-improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal-20190517t173506016z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	""
`created`	2019-05-17 17:36:57
`last_update`	2019-05-17 17:36:57
`depth`	5
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2019-05-24 17:36:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	40
`author_reputation`	14,709,692,204,215
`root_title`	"Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	85,039,035
`net_rshares`	6,169,977,442
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
stimialiti	0	0%
sirvotesalot	18,317,293,034	0.6%
realcleaner	-12,147,315,592	-0.6%

@valued-customer · May 17 '19

$0.03

That quote is factually incorrect.  Code is infinitely mutable, and all financial incentive to corrupt curation can be eliminated.  While some people will continue to act irrationally against their financial interests, currently it's irrational to not degrade curation for financial gain.  Eliminating, rather than merely tweaking that incentive, can be done, and I propose it below in reply to the OP.

👍 glenalbrethsen
👎 iflagtrash

`author`	valued-customer
`permlink`	re-holybranches-re-whatsup-re-steemitblog-improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal-20190517t173312927z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steempeak/1.9.9"}
`created`	2019-05-17 17:33:18
`last_update`	2019-05-17 17:33:18
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2019-05-24 17:33:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.020 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.006 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	402
`author_reputation`	363,818,997,826,539
`root_title`	"Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	85,038,811
`net_rshares`	51,187,030,854
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
iflagtrash	0 B		-39,176,462,447	-10%
glenalbrethsen	0 B		90,363,493,301	35%

@iflagtrash · May 17 '19

I flag trash.  You have received a flag.

👍 sirvotesalot, stimialiti
👎 realcleaner

`author`	iflagtrash
`permlink`	iflagtrash-re-valued-customerre-holybranches-re-whatsup-re-steemitblog-improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal-20190517t173312927z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	""
`created`	2019-05-17 17:35:03
`last_update`	2019-05-17 17:35:03
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2019-05-24 17:35:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	40
`author_reputation`	14,709,692,204,215
`root_title`	"Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	85,038,928
`net_rshares`	6,172,080,285
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
stimialiti	0	0%
sirvotesalot	18,319,459,234	0.6%
realcleaner	-12,147,378,949	-0.6%

@whatsup · May 16 '19

$0.03

I agree with this comment!  Read Vanderburg's post also

👍 novacadian, holybranches

`author`	whatsup
`permlink`	re-holybranches-re-whatsup-re-steemitblog-improving-the-economics-of-steem-a-community-proposal-20190516t230200912z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-05-16 23:02:03
`last_update`	2019-05-16 23:02:03
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2019-05-23 23:02:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.024 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.005 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	55
`author_reputation`	519,839,651,581,670
`root_title`	"Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	84,993,916
`net_rshares`	60,194,806,282
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
novacadian	0 B		50,170,987,869	25%
holybranches	0 B		10,023,818,413	100%