> Sometimes don't you wish you were wrong?

I *was* wrong.  I had no on-chain evidence, but neither did they.  I am myopic to on-chain evidence for protecting the chain.  I don't apologize for that.

I thought the community would take the attack on DPoS seriously.  I thought Tron wouldn't respond at all.  Or, I thought if they responded, I thought they'd work within the protocol (because there did exist a technical response that did not involve getting the exchanges involved).

I initially thought that when the exchanges *did* get involved, they only used Tron's exchange balances, which would have been *slightly* defensible, but the math didn't work out once you investigated that.  *By the way, a cool-headed response to exchange funds would have been to assume they only used Tron's balances and tweet that Tron must have 90% of the liquidity.*

Witnesses who want to keep their jobs is a given.  I don't blame them one bit for that.  But this "dev fund" they're fixated on seems to be the linchpin to the entire platform, which is hilarious.