RE: Exploring Steem Scalability by isnochys

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

steem · @isnochys · Apr 11 '18

$0.08

nah, first will be 19.4 ...appbase?
Or will they do both, HF20+appbase?
Because, well, why not introduce 2 error factors

`author`	isnochys
`permlink`	re-ats-david-re-smooth-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-exploring-steem-scalability-20180411t064603000z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-04-11 06:46:03
`last_update`	2018-04-11 06:46:03
`depth`	4
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2018-04-18 06:46:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.065 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.018 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	120
`author_reputation`	47,828,575,809,450
`root_title`	"Exploring Steem Scalability"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	49,440,229
`net_rshares`	19,127,018,793
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	rshares	pct
tuck-fheman	10,867,019,852	4%
sircork	7,825,106,590	100%
rogeriomlima	434,892,351	100%

$0.11

Only two would be an improvement. We’re used to a minimum of five at once around here.

`author`	ats-david
`permlink`	re-isnochys-re-ats-david-re-smooth-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-exploring-steem-scalability-20180411t183503201z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-04-11 18:35:03
`last_update`	2018-04-11 18:35:03
`depth`	5
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2018-04-18 18:35:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.084 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.021 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	86
`author_reputation`	324,017,334,201,433
`root_title`	"Exploring Steem Scalability"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	49,542,096
`net_rshares`	23,712,377,195
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	rshares	pct
tuck-fheman	10,867,019,852	4%
ocrdu	4,704,890,988	100%
sircork	7,711,699,248	100%
rogeriomlima	428,767,107	100%

$0.05

Maybe it needs to be an even number? :)

`author`	isnochys
`permlink`	re-ats-david-re-isnochys-re-ats-david-re-smooth-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-exploring-steem-scalability-20180411t183656479z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-04-11 18:37:00
`last_update`	2018-04-11 18:37:00
`depth`	6
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2018-04-18 18:37:00
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.036 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.010 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	39
`author_reputation`	47,828,575,809,450
`root_title`	"Exploring Steem Scalability"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	49,542,355
`net_rshares`	10,867,019,852
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
tuck-fheman	0 B		10,867,019,852	4%

$0.03

I thought STINC was using a Fibonacci sequence.

`author`	tuck-fheman
`permlink`	re-isnochys-re-ats-david-re-isnochys-re-ats-david-re-smooth-re-ats-david-re-steemitblog-exploring-steem-scalability-20180412t103907566z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-04-12 10:39:09
`last_update`	2018-04-12 10:39:09
`depth`	7
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2018-04-19 10:39:09
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.023 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.008 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	47
`author_reputation`	345,778,813,561,569
`root_title`	"Exploring Steem Scalability"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	49,652,209
`net_rshares`	7,484,884,565
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
sircork	0 B		7,484,884,565	100%