RE: Proof of Brain? 'Proof of Popularity'! by jaki01

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @luegenbaron/re-jaki01-py5vnc

steem · @jaki01 · Sep 21 '19

Actually, I wouldn't go so far to claim that. :)
Anyway, even the biggest STEEM earners suffered a net loss because of the decreasing STEEM price ...

👍 taxguy

`author`	jaki01
`permlink`	py5vwj
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-21 03:19:33
`last_update`	2019-09-21 03:19:33
`depth`	2
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2019-09-28 03:19:33
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	149
`author_reputation`	542,975,204,540,398
`root_title`	"Proof of Brain? 'Proof of Popularity'!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	90,780,240
`net_rshares`	27,880,105,181
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
taxguy	0 B		27,880,105,181	53%

@luegenbaron · Sep 21 '19 (edited)

No they didnt. Cuz they didnt join like me and you when steem was at 4$
They mined steem nearly for free.

And yes. This was a circle jerk for devs. It still is. That's why I'm posting about the authors with the biggest rewards from time to time.
I would have also been able to extract a lot of value, if I had teached myself python.

But I don't like abuse.

properties (22)

`author`	luegenbaron
`permlink`	re-jaki01-py5w3f
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steempeak/1.17.1"}
`created`	2019-09-21 03:23:39
`last_update`	2019-09-21 03:24:54
`depth`	3
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2019-09-28 03:23:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	358
`author_reputation`	27,465,249,085,978
`root_title`	"Proof of Brain? 'Proof of Popularity'!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	90,780,309
`net_rshares`	0

@jaki01 · Sep 21 '19 (edited)

As I said, I see things different than you.

For example, in general I wouldn't call it abuse to "extract" own money.

Yes, yes, there were some early miners, but that was even before I joined STEEM (and I am here since three years already). Since then nearly everybody, including some of the early miners, who didn't leave STEEM, suffered huge losses.
I myself doubled the amount of STEEM I own, but its value decreased dramatically.

I don't think that most stakeholders are having bad intentions, but unintentionally they are acting shortsightedly.

And the devs are by far <em>not</em> the biggest earners here.

properties (22)

`author`	jaki01
`permlink`	py5ws4
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-21 03:38:27
`last_update`	2019-09-21 03:38:57
`depth`	4
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2019-09-28 03:38:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	615
`author_reputation`	542,975,204,540,398
`root_title`	"Proof of Brain? 'Proof of Popularity'!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	90,780,524
`net_rshares`	0

@luegenbaron · Sep 21 '19

Believe what you want..

properties (22)