Viewing a response to: @schattenjaeger/re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t203048986z
> On the other hand, though, with low curation rewards, would the incentive to hold STEEM Power suffer? Yes. That simple, lol.
| author | jamesbrown |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-schattenjaeger-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t003903511z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-11-19 00:39:09 |
| last_update | 2016-11-19 00:40:12 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 128 |
| author_reputation | 16,631,565,299,506 |
| root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 1,799,047 |
| net_rshares | -14,939,194,344 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| orwellnightmare | 0 | -73,796,425 | -100% | ||
| matrixdweller | 0 | -18,395,324,905 | -100% | ||
| seraph | 0 | 3,331,976,752 | 100% | ||
| celestial | 0 | 197,950,234 | 50% |
hiveblocks