Viewing a response to: @remlaps/10-simple-rules-for-steemizenship-for-discussion
I disagree with number eight if you're trying to say that there is such a thing as bad publicity which a link could provide. I quote people. I include a link. I do this all the time. It is like a commercial. Ronald McDonald performs at birthday parties for free. Because marketing is valuable. That is what a link is. In other words, a link is a plug. It is valuable. That is why companies pay millions of dollars for ad time on television, on YouTube, on billboards, etc, as opposed to television shows giving the corporations money.
author | joeyarnoldvn |
---|---|
permlink | q1979v |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-11-20 05:58:45 |
last_update | 2019-11-20 05:58:45 |
depth | 1 |
children | 7 |
last_payout | 2019-11-27 05:58:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.044 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.044 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 534 |
author_reputation | 52,158,761,418,148 |
root_title | x |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 92,664,815 |
net_rshares | 511,406,863,115 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
remlaps | 0 | 24,486,608,621 | 100% | ||
remlaps1 | 0 | 468,097,078,593 | 100% | ||
remlaps2 | 0 | 5,736,336,654 | 100% | ||
remlaps-lite | 0 | 13,086,839,247 | 100% |
Thanks for the reply! On number 8, I'm not referring to bad publicity. Basically, I just mean that people should get credited for their work and ideas. For an example of what I mean, you can look at the beneficiary settings for cited authors in any of the posts from my daily [Science & technology digest](/@remlaps-lite/curating-the-internet-science-and-technology-digest-for-november-19-2019) series. You're right that linking to someone can be valuable, so if it's just a mention, and my sole intention is to draw attention to someone's post, then maybe I don't need to assign a beneficiary for them. But if I'm harnessing their creativity and using it to draw rewards for myself, then I think that a beneficiary setting is appropriate. I guess there is a sort-of a grey area as to exactly how much incorporation of ideas is enough to merit reward sharing.
author | remlaps |
---|---|
permlink | re-joeyarnoldvn-q19r0e |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steempeak/2.1.1"} |
created | 2019-11-20 13:05:03 |
last_update | 2019-11-20 13:05:03 |
depth | 2 |
children | 6 |
last_payout | 2019-11-27 13:05:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 865 |
author_reputation | 33,149,047,814,372 |
root_title | x |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 92,673,203 |
net_rshares | 34,013,785,338 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
logiczombie | 0 | 34,013,785,338 | 100% |
# Slippery Slope: That grey area concerns me. # Intellectual Theft? Also, the desire to require people to pay for what might be intellectual theft is dangerous. # Disney Theft For example, allegedly, according to a book, it is said that Walt Disney stole art from his business partner around the 1920's or so. Walt went on to copyright, to patent, his work. # Dangerous So, I say that to say that some of these things can be dangerous. # Weird Al Robbery Now, Weird Al would make parodies of famous songs. He has said that he doesn't even have to ask people for permission. Now, he says he does out of courtesy. But he is right that he doesn't have to. # Google Wars But, currently, YouTube (Google) and others have been attacking people who have made parodies themselves (and other things as well). # Fair Use Act Parodies and other things may in fact be completely or partly protected under the Fair Use Act in American law for example (depending on the piece, video, details, etc). # I Lost Thousands of Videos Google terminated three of my YouTube channels which means I lost thousands of videos which goes back to 1996. # Copyright Copyright can be tough to enforce. # Selective Enforcement What is worse is when copyright is selectively enforced. Sometimes, in life, one person will come up with what he or she may think is an original idea. Plagiarism is a tricky debate. It is more than a subject and more a subjective war between what might be recycled, reused, stolen, echoed, parodied, and Epstein didn't kill himself. # Nothing New Under Dee Sun? King Solomon said that there is nothing new under sun around three thousand years ago. For example, if I ask you, "HOW ARE YOU?" Then what? How dare you says Greta, just kidding. # How Are You? Is the adaptation or the reusing of idioms, common phrases, etc, then theft, etc? Can I ask you how you are? Am I not stealing that phrase? Should I give credit to whoever first said "How are you?" Because other people asked that question. Maybe that is an exception to the rule. But we can debate these types of things all day. # Speeches Like speeches for example. Like songs that talk about love. And then you have another song that talks about love as well. # Star Wars & Star Trek Spam? Then you have JJ Abrams who might be recycling some of his own ideas or that of other people as he did Star Trek and as he is doing Star Wars right now. # Piracy? Pirated videos may or may not be a crime. The actual process of getting it in the first place for example might be a crime, some might say. However, watching pirated videos shouldn't be a crime or isn't, technically. Also, the 4th amendment (privacy) is being violated. # Connecting Dots But I digress. I see connections and similarities between many different things. I'm connecting dots. I'm going down original oatmeal rabbit trails. So, I say that to say that people may steal things from other people. Sometimes, it is accidental. # Purposely, Maliciously? Now, it can be tough to prove when intellectual property is stolen on purpose, perhaps maliciously even. # Being Sued A person, later on, may still get sued or attacked for allegedly stealing the ideas from other people. Some of this can be way too subjective. # Invisible Lines The subjective line between what might be new and what might be not new is so vague like you said. # Compensate It is nice when people can pay people for helping. # Generosity So, if you helped me, then I should send you some money. True. Perhaps. I should not be required. But that would be generous of me. # Money However, money is not the only kind of money, by the way. Time is money. Good publicity has value as well. Cryptocurrencies has value as well. Gold has value. Salt was used as money centuries ago. So many things can be used as currency. Marketing is valuable. The list goes on and on. # Make Government Smaller People should try to link to their sources and pay them some money as well, perhaps. That would be nice. However, these things should not be required by federal or international laws. Local laws (for example), maybe in some cases to some extent. But for the most part, federally and globally, I prefer smaller government. So, copyrights, patents, trademarks, etc, can be better enforced/etc as government grows bigger and bigger in a pursuit to keep people allegedly safe through the means of stealing freedom from humans. # Conclusion So, I agree with you that people should try their best to credit people as much as possible, verbally and financially. So, both is good. In some cases, financial compensation may be earned, collected, gathered, etc, directly and indirectly via verbal citation as marketing has value for example.
author | joeyarnoldvn |
---|---|
permlink | q1a8ax |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-11-20 19:18:33 |
last_update | 2019-11-20 19:42:09 |
depth | 3 |
children | 5 |
last_payout | 2019-11-27 19:18:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.043 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.043 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 4,763 |
author_reputation | 52,158,761,418,148 |
root_title | x |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 92,683,144 |
net_rshares | 509,901,763,769 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
remlaps | 0 | 22,460,507,094 | 100% | ||
remlaps1 | 0 | 436,552,084,215 | 100% | ||
remlaps2 | 0 | 5,689,624,276 | 100% | ||
remlaps-lite | 0 | 11,845,611,005 | 100% | ||
logiczombie | 0 | 33,353,937,179 | 100% |
> Selective Enforcement What is worse is when copyright is selectively enforced. Sometimes, in life, one person will come up with what he or she may think is an original idea. Plagiarism is a tricky debate. It is more than a subject and more a subjective war between what might be recycled, reused, stolen, echoed, parodied, Well stated. Negative movie and or game reviewers are much more likely to be sued for copyright infringement and Positive movie and or game reviewers are much more likely to be given a free-pass. Also, your Competitors are very likely to flag your content for "copyright-infringement" since they win by default, anonymously, without even having to build a case or suffer consequences for false accusations.
author | logiczombie |
---|---|
permlink | q1bjwk |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-11-21 12:36:57 |
last_update | 2019-11-21 12:36:57 |
depth | 4 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2019-11-28 12:36:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 734 |
author_reputation | 41,793,140,992,203 |
root_title | x |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 92,703,419 |
net_rshares | 0 |
For the record, I would not propose a law to require this, just like I wouldn't support a law that mandates tipping or bans typing in ALL CAPS. Intellectual property laws are already a big enough mess. I am talking about personal conduct here, and in that context, I think it's a good practice for voluntary enactment. Thanks for the comprehensive feedback. You raised many good points, with which I mostly agree.
author | remlaps |
---|---|
permlink | re-joeyarnoldvn-q1adlv |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steempeak/2.1.1"} |
created | 2019-11-20 21:13:09 |
last_update | 2019-11-20 21:13:09 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2019-11-27 21:13:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 417 |
author_reputation | 33,149,047,814,372 |
root_title | x |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 92,685,583 |
net_rshares | 32,690,216,580 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
logiczombie | 0 | 32,690,216,580 | 100% |