https://s27.postimg.org/5y0uqtbw3/IMG_6732.jpg # I tend to be of the opinion that the "Resteem" is a valuable tool for the platform which serves an extremely important purpose, but that this feature need not be incentivized in terms of the "Resteemer" being rewarded for his or her service to the original blogger. # Here's why: **The Resteem is great. It allows for lesser-known authors who are pumping out great content to get noticed. It allows for old, buried content to be revitalized and reintroduced to new viewers.** ***It allows for valuable relationships to be forged, networking to be facilitated, and for Steemit as a platform, as a whole, to be more self-integrated and self-sustaining.*** # Why I don't think Resteems need to be rewarded. The Resteem is kind of a reward in and of itself. If someone resteems my content, I stand a chance to garner more votes, and thus a larger monetary compensation for my content. If someone resteems my post, I know immediately they value my content, or something I said, intimated, or proposed therein, more than "the average bear." ***When someone Resteems your stuff, you know you've connected. Many times this means you also have a new follower.*** The beauty of Steem is that those authors you dig, like you, are continually amassing Steem Power. This means that as you increase in clout blogging, collecting SP, and honing your craft, *so do they.* AND SO DO THEIR VOTES. The potential for synergistic relationships and exponential growth on Steemit is often overlooked and at worst, not even brought to the average Steemian's awareness. # Investment in Steem is more than just putting your money or content in. It is building relationships with people of like goals, mindsets, and passions, to the end of creating a synergy that will benefit both yourself and the entire Steem community, in the end...which...in the real end, BENEFITS YOU!!! Thus, introducing rewards for Resteeming a post is a redundancy, in my opinion. Market incentives for resteeming already exist, and in a big way. # What do you think? Should Resteems have separate rewards of their own? Let me know in the comments. # ~KafkA [<center></center>](https://steemit.com/@kafkanarchy84) *** ***Graham Smith is a Voluntaryist activist, creator, and peaceful parent residing in Niigata City, Japan. Graham runs the "Voluntary Japan" online initiative with a presence here on Steem, as well as Facebook and Twitter. (Hit me up so I can stop talking about myself in the third person.)*** https://s24.postimg.org/uww4iszxx/Steemit_sub_header.png https://s23.postimg.org/ca8ifyuej/image.jpg
author | kafkanarchy84 |
---|---|
permlink | should-resteems-be-rewarded |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem","steemit","resteem","cryptocurrency"],"image":["https://s27.postimg.org/5y0uqtbw3/IMG_6732.jpg","https://s29.postimg.org/4tdrtkp53/IMG_6356.jpg","https://s24.postimg.org/uww4iszxx/Steemit_sub_header.png","https://s23.postimg.org/ca8ifyuej/image.jpg"],"links":["https://steemit.com/@kafkanarchy84"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"} |
created | 2017-01-10 15:40:54 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 15:56:39 |
depth | 0 |
children | 25 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 9.290 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 1.453 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 2,692 |
author_reputation | 349,526,315,896,646 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,523 |
net_rshares | 39,198,426,631,232 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
barrie | 0 | 597,084,032,888 | 100% | ||
anonymous | 0 | 360,004,742,329 | 100% | ||
penambang | 0 | 23,480,347,369 | 70% | ||
berkah | 0 | 64,604,142,500 | 70% | ||
hello | 0 | 97,137,349,710 | 100% | ||
world | 0 | 39,512,275,391 | 100% | ||
fufubar1 | 0 | 57,449,977,968 | 100% | ||
badassmother | 0 | 479,292,420,840 | 40% | ||
xeldal | 0 | 7,944,136,590,012 | 100% | ||
enki | 0 | 4,789,866,107,317 | 100% | ||
tombstone | 0 | 14,572,400,220,313 | 70% | ||
rossco99 | 0 | 301,909,088,813 | 100% | ||
wang | 0 | 902,488,983,673 | 67% | ||
boy | 0 | 5,722,092,477 | 100% | ||
xeroc | 0 | 468,066,453,705 | 100% | ||
steem-id | 0 | 57,635,738,560 | 70% | ||
bue-witness | 0 | 6,967,267,532 | 100% | ||
bunny | 0 | 1,128,691,582 | 100% | ||
bue | 0 | 109,617,892,828 | 100% | ||
mini | 0 | 3,062,195,070 | 100% | ||
moon | 0 | 389,532,588 | 100% | ||
joseph | 0 | 275,531,403,171 | 67% | ||
au1nethyb1 | 0 | 847,237,501,397 | 40% | ||
masteryoda | 0 | 12,073,310,229 | 1% | ||
mineralwasser | 0 | 1,817,509,514 | 100% | ||
biodragon | 0 | 30,089,240,632 | 67% | ||
bingo-0 | 0 | 9,594,290,063 | 100% | ||
boatymcboatface | 0 | 175,461,207,527 | 100% | ||
pairmike | 0 | 28,471,535,274 | 100% | ||
pheonike | 0 | 4,169,675,148 | 0.4% | ||
proctologic | 0 | 58,771,147,250 | 70% | ||
idol | 0 | 1,486,240,478 | 67% | ||
healthcare | 0 | 1,146,044,770 | 100% | ||
daniel.pan | 0 | 1,809,205,938 | 100% | ||
jchch | 0 | 70,684,947,131 | 70% | ||
ilanaakoundi | 0 | 59,316,585,432 | 70% | ||
alexgr | 0 | 49,405,630,597 | 100% | ||
helen.tan | 0 | 526,277,484 | 100% | ||
jocelyn | 0 | 16,153,027,347 | 67% | ||
leesunmoo | 0 | 267,392,271,375 | 100% | ||
jademont | 0 | 17,315,997,743 | 80% | ||
eatgrits | 0 | 911,276,970 | 100% | ||
kingscrown | 0 | 105,804,944,128 | 100% | ||
cryptoctopus | 0 | 425,363,805,698 | 52.5% | ||
acidyo | 0 | 78,889,740,275 | 100% | ||
murh | 0 | 1,267,269,989 | 11% | ||
blakemiles84 | 0 | 92,217,386,813 | 100% | ||
theshell | 0 | 75,483,134,151 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 531,616,660,066 | 100% | ||
hisnameisolllie | 0 | 153,974,643,560 | 70% | ||
pangur-ban | 0 | 1,324,603,460 | 70% | ||
kennyskitchen | 0 | 19,271,934,545 | 100% | ||
schro | 0 | 79,941,621,006 | 70% | ||
tee-em | 0 | 39,944,028,552 | 70% | ||
michaelx | 0 | 10,380,038,514 | 100% | ||
proglobyte | 0 | 2,053,182,511 | 50% | ||
albertogm | 0 | 13,551,717,695 | 100% | ||
lukestokes | 0 | 366,496,475,105 | 100% | ||
svamiva | 0 | 33,163,942,233 | 100% | ||
jonnyrevolution | 0 | 2,878,318,623 | 10% | ||
fyrstikken | 0 | 54,593,453,947 | 2% | ||
skapaneas | 0 | 10,242,761,510 | 100% | ||
bacchist | 0 | 120,752,931,433 | 70% | ||
michaellamden68 | 0 | 2,172,314,286 | 100% | ||
artem-sokoloff | 0 | 5,186,621,893 | 100% | ||
good-karma | 0 | 51,401,588,811 | 53.6% | ||
roelandp | 0 | 137,278,320,330 | 67% | ||
dennygalindo | 0 | 11,827,550,577 | 100% | ||
getssidetracked | 0 | 6,875,926,223 | 100% | ||
konstantin | 0 | 14,376,983,749 | 100% | ||
trees | 0 | 1,504,556,825 | 100% | ||
strawhat | 0 | 2,311,132,022 | 100% | ||
cryptochannel | 0 | 5,641,941,074 | 100% | ||
rxhector | 0 | 1,620,658,831 | 70% | ||
picokernel | 0 | 18,266,824,996 | 67% | ||
onthewayout | 0 | 3,525,119,009 | 100% | ||
mrgreen | 0 | 12,865,837,361 | 100% | ||
steem1653 | 0 | 3,964,455,187 | 63% | ||
lrock | 0 | 25,752,284,063 | 100% | ||
raymondspeaks | 0 | 4,170,391,207 | 100% | ||
allmonitors | 0 | 17,257,736,236 | 100% | ||
cm1 | 0 | 235,498,378 | 100% | ||
dimon14 | 0 | 4,611,186,488 | 100% | ||
cryptojoy.com | 0 | 1,114,422,256 | 100% | ||
phenom | 0 | 8,930,712,919 | 100% | ||
mynameisbrian | 0 | 74,738,879,748 | 100% | ||
thylbom | 0 | 297,536,091,572 | 70% | ||
shredlord | 0 | 25,549,475,303 | 100% | ||
james212 | 0 | 1,489,937,681,334 | 100% | ||
pokemon | 0 | 250,101,112 | 100% | ||
mysteem | 0 | 2,525,226,811 | 53.6% | ||
alex.chien | 0 | 1,700,826,752 | 100% | ||
greymass | 0 | 16,739,264,796 | 70% | ||
tommyhansen | 0 | 69,014,297,042 | 100% | ||
proglobyte-m1 | 0 | 2,052,148,626 | 30% | ||
craigslist | 0 | 777,242,440 | 100% | ||
tingaling | 0 | 1,715,550,080 | 25% | ||
brendio | 0 | 26,228,291,969 | 80% | ||
kurtbeil | 0 | 45,069,870,927 | 50% | ||
ipumba | 0 | 5,867,430,174 | 100% | ||
d3nv3r | 0 | 1,982,781,632 | 70% | ||
dolov | 0 | 2,715,915,508 | 100% | ||
bigsambucca | 0 | 503,837,807 | 100% | ||
steemradio | 0 | 776,581,035 | 100% | ||
cmorton | 0 | 1,552,242,131 | 50% | ||
numberone | 0 | 6,159,051,590 | 100% | ||
lightsplasher | 0 | 60,858,797,956 | 100% | ||
zentat | 0 | 2,503,849,187 | 50% | ||
frankbacon | 0 | 864,713,806 | 100% | ||
pjheinz | 0 | 15,624,922,142 | 100% | ||
virtualgrowth | 0 | 625,687,490 | 1% | ||
anotherjoe | 0 | 190,146,528,063 | 100% | ||
kafkanarchy84 | 0 | 76,087,229,765 | 100% | ||
neptun | 0 | 428,902,112,802 | 100% | ||
cryptomancer | 0 | 158,699,858,200 | 100% | ||
lasseehlers | 0 | 5,637,453,829 | 100% | ||
sethlinson | 0 | 4,007,247,610 | 21% | ||
hilarski | 0 | 37,232,079,955 | 21% | ||
craigwilliamz | 0 | 4,896,158,156 | 100% | ||
naquoya | 0 | 92,068,501,685 | 100% | ||
steembriefing | 0 | 1,285,549,210 | 20% | ||
escapeamericanow | 0 | 3,690,658,526 | 100% | ||
nulliusinverba | 0 | 3,065,848,864 | 100% | ||
ats-david | 0 | 135,303,688,802 | 70% | ||
jlufer | 0 | 4,729,291,147 | 100% | ||
blockcodes | 0 | 1,727,507,290 | 100% | ||
cryptochart | 0 | 77,001,371 | 100% | ||
canadian-coconut | 0 | 87,376,263,744 | 100% | ||
areynolds | 0 | 2,515,867,216 | 100% | ||
tylerdav | 0 | 665,870,566 | 100% | ||
renzoarg | 0 | 6,361,697,319 | 50% | ||
finleyexp | 0 | 584,000,770 | 53.6% | ||
tracemayer | 0 | 16,243,628,231 | 100% | ||
littlescribe | 0 | 10,456,423,204 | 70% | ||
feruz | 0 | 91,882,857 | 53.6% | ||
burnin | 0 | 7,762,102,877 | 70% | ||
bestoftherest | 0 | 3,315,932,943 | 70% | ||
ballinconscious | 0 | 7,492,287,450 | 100% | ||
paxmagnus | 0 | 16,220,752,483 | 70% | ||
ocrdu | 0 | 14,035,288,002 | 50% | ||
lajulius | 0 | 6,357,370,739 | 63% | ||
thegame | 0 | 114,977,370 | 1% | ||
donchate | 0 | 7,861,557,087 | 100% | ||
fortinbuff | 0 | 10,442,081,890 | 100% | ||
ssekulji | 0 | 6,607,417,763 | 100% | ||
surpassinggoogle | 0 | 6,776,802,846 | 70% | ||
steembets | 0 | 105,183,410 | 1% | ||
saiku | 0 | 8,385,454,642 | 100% | ||
steemint | 0 | 1,762,481,558 | 25% | ||
cebymaster | 0 | 11,924,905,099 | 100% | ||
michaelstobiersk | 0 | 34,155,678,832 | 100% | ||
gamer00 | 0 | 46,901,469,149 | 70% | ||
freiheit50 | 0 | 28,168,623,970 | 100% | ||
sirlunchthehost | 0 | 472,507,107 | 1% | ||
ianstrat | 0 | 1,617,487,823 | 100% | ||
giantbear | 0 | 18,301,223,309 | 100% | ||
supergoodliving | 0 | 21,588,800,509 | 70% | ||
ianboil | 0 | 2,027,870,673 | 100% | ||
olga.maslievich | 0 | 15,196,854,654 | 100% | ||
sstefan | 0 | 3,361,906,367 | 40% | ||
unipsycho | 0 | 9,481,857,305 | 25% | ||
amadeus | 0 | 143,180,024 | 100% | ||
steemland.com | 0 | 105,096,489 | 1% | ||
adelja | 0 | 557,875,976 | 100% | ||
maxse | 0 | 4,166,109,852 | 100% | ||
nigelmarkdias | 0 | 351,197,689 | 100% | ||
jfesrom | 0 | 1,448,196,049 | 33% | ||
fosho | 0 | 169,686,148 | 28% | ||
teukumukhlis | 0 | 4,748,995,425 | 53.6% | ||
grildrig | 0 | 2,448,134,754 | 100% | ||
esteemapp | 0 | 95,385,662 | 53.6% | ||
chiliec | 0 | 557,682,798 | 53.6% | ||
steemprentice | 0 | 1,128,131,012 | 1% | ||
steemperor | 0 | 18,617,033,923 | 70% | ||
steempire | 0 | 55,497,171,518 | 70% | ||
reisman | 0 | 1,679,800,338 | 70% | ||
igor1966 | 0 | 577,888,169 | 100% | ||
writingamigo | 0 | 10,896,690,014 | 70% | ||
tonicbbleking | 0 | 604,444,128 | 70% | ||
tamersameeh | 0 | 196,511,655 | 67% | ||
kingfelix | 0 | 2,823,344,559 | 100% | ||
daianynascimento | 0 | 1,937,098,008 | 100% | ||
nik69 | 0 | 117,876,890 | 100% | ||
automaton | 0 | 423,459,324 | 100% | ||
firesteem | 0 | 271,485,553 | 100% | ||
crazyhorselady | 0 | 442,268,597 | 100% | ||
priyanka | 0 | 417,406,566 | 100% | ||
healthmatters | 0 | 417,370,633 | 100% |
Here come the resteeming bots, right? I like the feature as-is, for all the reasons you gave. Paying folks to resteem would create some nightmares of resteeming for profit. Of course, we could unfollow those folks, so maybe it would work. Upon reflection, I guess the market would decide how it was used if they did. But I like the goodwill aspect of it.
author | anotherjoe |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t161437210z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 16:14:36 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 16:14:36 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 354 |
author_reputation | 40,326,779,382,210 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,877 |
net_rshares | 76,851,206,615 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kafkanarchy84 | 0 | 74,951,722,621 | 100% | ||
canadian-coconut | 0 | 1,899,483,994 | 1% |
>I guess the market would decide how it was used if they did. Right. If it was incentivized, I really wouldn't mind, necessarily. I trust free markets. I just think it is kind of nice, as is.
author | kafkanarchy84 |
---|---|
permlink | re-anotherjoe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t164235812z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 16:42:30 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 16:42:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 192 |
author_reputation | 349,526,315,896,646 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,213,123 |
net_rshares | 7,313,328,002 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
anotherjoe | 0 | 7,313,328,002 | 1% |
I agree. I've resteemed.
author | artem-sokoloff |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t194719685z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 19:47:15 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 19:47:15 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 24 |
author_reputation | 63,785,479,701,078 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,214,736 |
net_rshares | 78,244,246,715 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kafkanarchy84 | 0 | 78,244,246,715 | 100% |
Cheers. Thanks very much.
author | kafkanarchy84 |
---|---|
permlink | re-artem-sokoloff-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170111t014202771z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-11 01:42:03 |
last_update | 2017-01-11 01:42:03 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 25 |
author_reputation | 349,526,315,896,646 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,217,053 |
net_rshares | 0 |
If I upvote a post first and then resteem it, the additional attention it gets will only benefit me more.
author | darkflame |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t202138092z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 20:21:39 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 20:21:39 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 105 |
author_reputation | 91,920,963,076,187 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,214,974 |
net_rshares | 0 |
yes i am with you... Resteam should be incentivized.. @kafkanarchy84 followed
author | dylanzachary |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t154340462z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"users":["kafkanarchy84"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 15:43:42 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 15:43:42 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 77 |
author_reputation | -124,825,347,477 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,556 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I did not argue for the incentivization of Resteems.
author | kafkanarchy84 |
---|---|
permlink | re-dylanzachary-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t154804708z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 15:48:00 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 15:48:00 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 52 |
author_reputation | 349,526,315,896,646 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,592 |
net_rshares | 0 |
The resteem is enough reward as is. No reward system should be given to a resteem. I have also thought of the resteem going to one central place like trending but then I am sure people will not check the resteem menu. I like things the way they are now. Just getting used to everything. What irritates me most is that people do not answer when someone makes a comment. Further I am very happy with steemit just the way it is. :)
author | giantbear |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t155658236z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 15:57:03 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 15:57:03 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 435 |
author_reputation | 419,012,927,701,052 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,670 |
net_rshares | 74,534,429,158 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kafkanarchy84 | 0 | 74,534,429,158 | 100% |
Resteem rewards would be great but would need to be limited. If they counted towards your total posts per day I would be cool with it. Maybe no more rewards after 2 or 4 and rewards should only be based on post resteem rewards. For example a post might have $5 but then I resteem and it earns $20. I would only be eligible for rewards on $15. I do like how it works currently but the idea has value.
author | hilarski |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t175554928z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 17:55:54 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 17:55:54 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 401 |
author_reputation | 488,873,580,141,533 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,213,800 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I like your idea of the max # of 2 or 4 resteems being rewarded. Plus your reward should only be based on people who click and vote via your resteem link. Right now I dislike how some people resteem 10-20 times a day, as it builds up my feed too quickly. For example, I have wanted to follow someone who supports my blog and posts good articles about once a week, however I could not because all of his resteems were filling up my feed, and they weren't the type of topics that I was really interested in.
author | canadian-coconut |
---|---|
permlink | re-hilarski-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t181430477z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 18:14:33 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 18:14:33 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 507 |
author_reputation | 96,294,848,609,233 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,213,931 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I agree with you. If I resteem it is because I believe the post deserves it and not for monetary gain
author | ianstrat |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t155112873z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 15:51:18 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 15:51:18 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 101 |
author_reputation | 12,786,084,463,699 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,624 |
net_rshares | 74,534,429,158 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kafkanarchy84 | 0 | 74,534,429,158 | 100% |
I fear a resteem reward will lead to even worse results than upvote reward bots. Resteeming bots would clutter the system severely.
author | jacobtothe |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170111t024127841z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-11 02:41:30 |
last_update | 2017-01-11 02:41:30 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 131 |
author_reputation | 568,159,105,909,319 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,217,415 |
net_rshares | 0 |
You bring forth an excellent point worth discussion. I think they could be rewarded. More importantly, I would like to see resteems in a separate file from the main blog. ☆☆☆☆☆😎
author | michaelstobiersk |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t154611712z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 15:46:12 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 15:46:36 |
depth | 1 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 178 |
author_reputation | 28,639,834,562,096 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,581 |
net_rshares | 76,939,237,789 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kafkanarchy84 | 0 | 76,087,229,765 | 100% | ||
imerick | 0 | 852,008,024 | 100% |
A separate category for resteems is a great idea.
author | kafkanarchy84 |
---|---|
permlink | re-michaelstobiersk-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t154850054z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 15:48:45 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 15:48:45 |
depth | 2 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 49 |
author_reputation | 349,526,315,896,646 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,598 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Any idea if this is coming? I saw a post some time ago that it'd be implemented. But it's still not here :'( Resteems should be rewarded, they're a big part of curation. But what I'd really really love to see, is upvoting and commenting on 'old' posts. There's so many great old posts that are just forgotten or never even looked at, while they still are worth attention. A lot of times I find awesome posts that haven't earned anything while a lot of efford is put in. I've got the idea that if someone posts little every day, it has a lot more potential on this platform because old posts could never get 'trending' again.
author | maxse |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-re-michaelstobiersk-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t160732491z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 16:07:39 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 16:07:39 |
depth | 3 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 627 |
author_reputation | 9,504,532,692,213 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,802 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I followed you.
author | michaelstobiersk |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-re-michaelstobiersk-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t170324285z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 17:03:24 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 17:03:24 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 15 |
author_reputation | 28,639,834,562,096 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,213,319 |
net_rshares | 0 |
It would probably lead to a lot of annoying spam.
author | schattenjaeger |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t161141836z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 16:11:54 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 16:11:54 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 49 |
author_reputation | 132,607,893,972,093 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,845 |
net_rshares | 75,334,847,373 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kafkanarchy84 | 0 | 74,951,722,621 | 100% | ||
nigelmarkdias | 0 | 383,124,752 | 100% |
Good point.
author | michaelstobiersk |
---|---|
permlink | re-schattenjaeger-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t170106883z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 17:01:09 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 17:01:09 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 11 |
author_reputation | 28,639,834,562,096 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,213,293 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I don't think resteeming should be rewarded, because then it becomes tainted by the monetary value of resteeming. People will resteem because it advantages them monetarily regardless of whether they like the post or not. Resteeming is about showing support and affinity with a particular post or author. IMHO, it should stay that way.
author | seablue |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t185216013z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 18:52:12 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 18:52:12 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 337 |
author_reputation | 18,862,018,948,644 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,214,310 |
net_rshares | 182,833,604 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
seablue | 0 | 182,833,604 | 1% |
I honestly don't care if I get rewarded for resteeming. What I DO want, however, is the ability to add a comment to my resteem, such as "This is awesome, you should check this out" or something like that.
author | winstonwolfe |
---|---|
permlink | re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t162302735z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 16:23:09 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 16:23:09 |
depth | 1 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 204 |
author_reputation | 161,894,117,584,940 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,212,966 |
net_rshares | 100,318,762,786 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kafkanarchy84 | 0 | 74,951,722,621 | 100% | ||
mikkolyytinen | 0 | 24,515,032,141 | 100% | ||
imerick | 0 | 852,008,024 | 100% |
Great idea!
author | canadian-coconut |
---|---|
permlink | re-winstonwolfe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t180930349z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 18:09:33 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 18:09:33 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 11 |
author_reputation | 96,294,848,609,233 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,213,898 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I like this idea a lot.
author | imerick |
---|---|
permlink | re-winstonwolfe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170111t052144308z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-11 05:21:42 |
last_update | 2017-01-11 05:21:42 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 23 |
author_reputation | 1,635,611,053,148 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,218,156 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Good point! I agree 100%.
author | michaelstobiersk |
---|---|
permlink | re-winstonwolfe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t170152829z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 17:01:54 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 17:01:54 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 25 |
author_reputation | 28,639,834,562,096 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,213,303 |
net_rshares | 5,698,451,983 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
canadian-coconut | 0 | 5,698,451,983 | 6% |
I would like to comment on Resteems too.
author | seablue |
---|---|
permlink | re-winstonwolfe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t185404342z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2017-01-10 18:54:00 |
last_update | 2017-01-10 18:54:00 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-02-10 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 40 |
author_reputation | 18,862,018,948,644 |
root_title | "Should Resteems be Rewarded?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,214,330 |
net_rshares | 182,833,604 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
seablue | 0 | 182,833,604 | 1% |