Viewing a response to: @anonymint/re-madillorama-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t070530601z
Hmm. What if you randomly generated half the accounts that shared the influence of the the whale account? And what if the randomly selected accounts were still set to be in a mandatory vest bracket? The mandatory accounts could be reassigned every year. Do you think that could work?
| author | madillorama |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-anonymint-re-madillorama-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t152304486z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-08-11 15:23:03 |
| last_update | 2016-08-11 15:23:03 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 283 |
| author_reputation | 2,545,105,353,619 |
| root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 746,966 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks