create account

RE: Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated by marki99

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @netuoso/q66jfk

· @marki99 · (edited)
Your argument makes no sense because no one said the ninja mine is okay. When it is sold, then the bad action has been done. Ninja mine for profit = bad. 

But the person who bought the stake is not responsible for the actions of the previous holder of that stake. 

If I sold you 1000 Steem and was abusing my stake, upvoting myself 10 times a day, does that mean that you should now be downvoted by spam preventers?

And to answer your car example, if the car was sold illegally, then yes, it still belongs to the original owner. However, if the transaction was completely legal, then it belongs to the buyer. Other problems are not his to deal with. 

Tron acquired their stake fairly.
properties (22)
authormarki99
permlinkq66lyw
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-02-24 01:11:21
last_update2020-02-24 01:14:27
depth3
children3
last_payout2020-03-02 01:11:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length688
author_reputation11,400,723,818,181
root_title"Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,759,889
net_rshares0
@jaguar.force ·
You have a very strange definition of fairness, and that stake came with strings attached, it swapping hands makes no difference, the strings are still attached.
properties (22)
authorjaguar.force
permlinkq66s4g
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-02-24 03:24:18
last_update2020-02-24 03:24:18
depth4
children0
last_payout2020-03-02 03:24:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length161
author_reputation227,715,377,802,170
root_title"Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,762,645
net_rshares0
@lordbutterfly ·
What Netouso said is 100% correct. You even have laws in place for this exact thing. 
The person who bought the stake doesnt get to keep the stake no string attached. If he has a problem, Ned is the person he should get reparations from..  
👍  
properties (23)
authorlordbutterfly
permlinkre-marki99-q66m7c
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steempeak/2020.02.2"}
created2020-02-24 01:16:24
last_update2020-02-24 01:16:24
depth4
children0
last_payout2020-03-02 01:16:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length240
author_reputation1,546,602,330,290,758
root_title"Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,759,987
net_rshares12,668,712,797
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth · (edited)
You're mistaken about how stolen property works, though that analogy is so strained as to be entirely irrelevant  here.

But as a matter of trivia (and so you are better informed), in fact if property is stolen then even a 'legitimate' buyer has to give it back to the rightful owner and then get a refund from the seller.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkq66q5j
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.2"}
created2020-02-24 02:41:51
last_update2020-02-24 02:42:15
depth4
children0
last_payout2020-03-02 02:41:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length322
author_reputation260,342,945,372,716
root_title"Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id95,761,670
net_rshares61,411,893,371
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)