This user that I'm talking about does, in my opinion, have very deeply held convictions that, I believe, stem partly from analysis and partly from philosophical approach based on temperament (It is quite normal for people to have their politics to be informed by their temperament). He is not stupid by any means and debating someone like that always makes one dig a little deeper and often learn something. But I'm not buying his views. There are too many holes in them, in my opinion. But for all practical purposes there exists no such thing as a worldview without flaws or failure to cover important aspects of life, universe and everything.