Viewing a response to: @condra/re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t023128715z
I agree totally with you, voting and curating should be reassessed, I have noticed several irregularities; it's more like a "postcode" lottery where they are more concerned in the rewards instead of the content. Not very democratic or is it?!?! The whole scenario is quite a conundrum, therefore I think it will take something extraordinary to remedy it!! Ultimately, we are still in the early stages of steem; we must encourage and nurture it like an infant, eventually it will find its own way?!!!
| author | michaellamden68 |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t084343782z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-08-11 08:43:45 |
| last_update | 2016-08-11 08:43:45 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 501 |
| author_reputation | 98,902,028,363,203 |
| root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 742,071 |
| net_rshares | 1,209,865,215 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| michaellamden68 | 0 | 1,209,865,215 | 100% |
hiveblocks