RE: Steem experiment: Burn post #553 by michealb

`author`	michealb
`permlink`	q4dspg
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2020-01-20 01:12:54
`last_update`	2020-01-20 01:12:54
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2020-01-27 01:12:54
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	23
`author_reputation`	50,654,291,488,675
`root_title`	"Steem experiment: Burn post #553"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	94,561,668
`net_rshares`	0

$0.19

With custom code, yes.  Through the standard UI, no.

It also remains to be seen if capping is even effective. In the case of @sbdpotato, the last post was capped at $25 but still got $57 worth of votes. It is the votes that determine trending, not the payout. Maybe in time people will learn to stop wasting their votes, but who knows.

👍 michealb, jocieprosza

`author`	smooth
`permlink`	q4dt1g
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"users":["sbdpotato"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2020-01-20 01:20:09
`last_update`	2020-01-20 01:20:09
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2020-01-27 01:20:09
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.097 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.097 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	336
`author_reputation`	260,342,945,372,716
`root_title`	"Steem experiment: Burn post #553"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	94,561,873
`net_rshares`	1,118,800,204,983
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
jocieprosza	0 B		14,284,894,641	100%
michealb	0 B		1,104,515,310,342	12%