Viewing a response to: @timcliff/re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t160622179z
>I'm not quite sure about the domain and service provider receiving a share of the rewards. I understand companies need to make a profit, and it is a good incentive to encourage adoption - so I am not opposed to it, but I would need to know more details about how it would work before I would be fully on board with the idea. The website that a post or comment is created inside of would be able to dictate the % cut that goes to the posters and or commenters. For instance Zerohedge could give a % of STEEM rewards to their authors while taking a percentage for posting the link to the ZH article. As another example, the commenters posting through a Steem-Disqus would be given a % while Steem-'scus could also take a %. And like Steemit exists now, some platforms could always give 100% of Steem rewards to the poster/commenter.
author | ned |
---|---|
permlink | re-timcliff-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t161416908z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-18 16:14:15 |
last_update | 2016-11-18 16:14:15 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 834 |
author_reputation | 94,449,026,656,258 |
root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,795,929 |
net_rshares | 351,362,222,241 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
timcliff | 0 | 18,852,298,762 | 20% | ||
ekitcho | 0 | 309,147,808,026 | 100% | ||
matrixdweller | 0 | 21,133,107,717 | 100% | ||
steemitfaucet | 0 | 2,151,313,475 | 100% | ||
johnathanhenry | 0 | 77,694,261 | 76% |
Ok. So basically each interface could define how the rewards for posts/comments in their domain would be allocated. That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation!
author | timcliff |
---|---|
permlink | re-ned-re-timcliff-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t162250198z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-18 16:22:51 |
last_update | 2016-11-18 16:22:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 161 |
author_reputation | 272,954,445,077,789 |
root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,795,994 |
net_rshares | 21,133,107,717 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
matrixdweller | 0 | 21,133,107,717 | 100% |