RE: How to Save Steem by pharesim

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @kevinwong/how-to-save-steem

steem · @pharesim · Sep 28 '19

$0.07

I actually like the circle voting index thing. Can you elaborate? :P

👍 kevinwong, etherpunk, rubenalexander

`author`	pharesim
`permlink`	pyjtgi
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-28 15:53:09
`last_update`	2019-09-28 15:53:09
`depth`	1
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2019-10-05 15:53:09
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.033 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.033 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	68
`author_reputation`	239,450,405,799,183
`root_title`	"How to Save Steem"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	91,033,804
`net_rshares`	324,069,788,235
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
kevinwong	251,319,915,049	3%
rubenalexander	0	100%
etherpunk	72,749,873,186	50%

@kevinwong · Sep 28 '19

$0.10

Lol i just thought about it while i was writing. Someone must've come up with the VCI already? If not, maybe a rudimentary calc is simply VCI = x / y, where:-

- x = total voting power that's self-voted + reciprocated over z days (perhaps by a margin of 15% of 1:1 exchange).
- y = total voting power cast over z days.

So yeah, there's no way VCI > 1.0 lol. Probably easy to do if can calc data for x right from the script in http://steemreports.com/votes-graph/ since it already shows the direction/magnitude of votes clearly. Dunno what's the time period used though.

👍 pharesim

`author`	kevinwong
`permlink`	pyk28q
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"links":["http://steemreports.com/votes-graph/"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-28 19:02:51
`last_update`	2019-09-28 19:02:51
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2019-10-05 19:02:51
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.050 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.050 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	570
`author_reputation`	621,253,570,295,288
`root_title`	"How to Save Steem"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	91,038,397
`net_rshares`	485,221,170,275
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
pharesim	0 B		485,221,170,275	100%

@kevinwong · Sep 29 '19

Lol traf said thats basically the dishonest vote %. i'll just stick with VCI coz it just sounds cooler :p

properties (22)

`author`	kevinwong
`permlink`	pykskw
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-09-29 04:31:45
`last_update`	2019-09-29 04:31:45
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2019-10-06 04:31:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	105
`author_reputation`	621,253,570,295,288
`root_title`	"How to Save Steem"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	91,049,569
`net_rshares`	0

@pharesim · Sep 29 '19

Catchy abbreviations are important. DVP is somewhat closer to EIP, which worked well. I'm fine with both!

properties (22)