create account

RE: People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards by rhi-marie

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dantheman/people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards

· @rhi-marie ·
I'm having a hard time understanding this concept (like I do with most things relating to Steemit haha), <b>but</b> could this not just result in 'cliques'  forming? Currently I feel like minnows band together largely as one and then whales band together, in regards to who they communicate with regularly and where votes are allocated (of course there are exceptions). Wouldn't this mean when users select their '30', groups with high influence will form, and so will groups with low influence - because that's who they know? Wouldn't this be a similar version to what we have now? And wouldn't that make it just as hard for minnows to rise through the ranks? Correct me if I'm wrong.
👍  
properties (23)
authorrhi-marie
permlinkre-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t032306086z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-11 03:22:57
last_update2016-08-11 03:22:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-09-10 19:32:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length685
author_reputation2,829,686,620,896
root_title"People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id738,910
net_rshares4,221,505,758
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)