RE: I submitted my first hardfork pull request to the Steem blockchain! (Updates to the SBD print rate.) by roomservice

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @timcliff/i-submitted-my-first-hardfork-pull-request-to-the-steem-blockchain-updates-to-the-sbd-print-rate

steem · @roomservice · May 28 '18

$0.04

Hi @timcliff,
thanks for contributing code to the Steem project - I cannot agree more on your blog that we need many more freelancing developer in order to become more independent from Steemit, Inc. 

If you REALLY have some spare time for another pull request, you could look into this Steem protocol improvement proposal here:
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@steemhq/how-to-make-steem-great-again-the-exponential-author-reward-method

I really think this could be a game changer for Steem and could fix a lot of problems we currently see on the platform.

👍 timcliff

`author`	roomservice
`permlink`	re-timcliff-i-submitted-my-first-hardfork-pull-request-to-the-steem-blockchain-updates-to-the-sbd-print-rate-20180528t201536385z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"users":["timcliff"],"links":["https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@steemhq/how-to-make-steem-great-again-the-exponential-author-reward-method"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-05-28 20:15:36
`last_update`	2018-05-28 20:15:36
`depth`	1
`children`	7
`last_payout`	2018-06-04 20:15:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.036 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	556
`author_reputation`	11,573,428,661,334
`root_title`	"I submitted my first hardfork pull request to the Steem blockchain! (Updates to the SBD print rate.)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	58,166,699
`net_rshares`	9,336,890,485
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
timcliff	0 B		9,336,890,485	1%

@timcliff · May 28 '18

$0.18

I have seen the proposal, and am not really in favor of the change. I do not believe in "punishing success" which is basically what it does to posts that are receiving a high payout, and for users who are interested in extracting the maximum amount of rewards - it will just push them to split their content into as many posts/comments as possible, and upvoting all of the smaller items. TLDR: lots more spam.

👍 roomservice, edb

`author`	timcliff
`permlink`	re-roomservice-re-timcliff-i-submitted-my-first-hardfork-pull-request-to-the-steem-blockchain-updates-to-the-sbd-print-rate-20180528t202136984z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-05-28 20:20:57
`last_update`	2018-05-28 20:20:57
`depth`	2
`children`	6
`last_payout`	2018-06-04 20:20:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.173 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.009 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	409
`author_reputation`	272,954,445,077,789
`root_title`	"I submitted my first hardfork pull request to the Steem blockchain! (Updates to the SBD print rate.)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	58,167,286
`net_rshares`	45,958,887,253
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
edb	0 B		18,519,031,182	70.5%
roomservice	0 B		27,439,856,071	5%

@mepatriot · May 28 '18

$0.19

Kudos on the discussion of moving needed changes faster via other stakeholders than Steemit Inc.!

However, do you have any thoughts as to how to improve the current situation where low-quality content often gets many multiples of the rewards of high quality content, simply on the basis of the longevity or steem power of the author?  Our retention rate and percentage of quality posts MUST be improved if we are to succeed long term.

👍 timcliff

`author`	mepatriot
`permlink`	re-timcliff-re-roomservice-re-timcliff-i-submitted-my-first-hardfork-pull-request-to-the-steem-blockchain-updates-to-the-sbd-print-rate-20180528t230224378z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-05-28 23:02:24
`last_update`	2018-05-28 23:02:24
`depth`	3
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2018-06-04 23:02:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.141 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.047 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	435
`author_reputation`	94,587,829,816,945
`root_title`	"I submitted my first hardfork pull request to the Steem blockchain! (Updates to the SBD print rate.)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	58,184,742
`net_rshares`	46,758,008,360
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
timcliff	0 B		46,758,008,360	6%

@timcliff · May 28 '18

The short answer: downvoting. This area is probably where I will put my attention next after I complete the other SBD change.

properties (22)

`author`	timcliff
`permlink`	re-mepatriot-re-timcliff-re-roomservice-re-timcliff-i-submitted-my-first-hardfork-pull-request-to-the-steem-blockchain-updates-to-the-sbd-print-rate-20180528t233356999z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-05-28 23:34:57
`last_update`	2018-05-28 23:34:57
`depth`	4
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2018-06-04 23:34:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	125
`author_reputation`	272,954,445,077,789
`root_title`	"I submitted my first hardfork pull request to the Steem blockchain! (Updates to the SBD print rate.)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	58,187,914
`net_rshares`	0

3 replies

@roomservice · May 28 '18

Fair enough, thanks for even looking into it!

properties (22)