Viewing a response to: @anonymint/re-sigmajin-re-anonymint-blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed-20160811t222028988z
> No you apparently entirely missed the point of why a vulnerability could cause some attacker to siphon away all the wealth. As opposed to a few dozen select authors doing the same in exchange for hyping the currency and its centralized control system? Yeah, i get where you stand. ANd so does everyone reading a post like this.
author | sigmajin |
---|---|
permlink | re-anonymint-re-sigmajin-re-anonymint-blog-rewards-can-t-be-widely-distributed-20160811t231357936z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 23:13:57 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 23:13:57 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 09:37:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 332 |
author_reputation | 35,847,511,233,614 |
root_title | "Blog rewards CAN’T be widely distributed" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 755,035 |
net_rshares | 0 |