Viewing a response to: @alitas/re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t031608836z
They did, but eventually it evolved into an automated (?) system. Do we know, by the way, to what extent Google still uses non-automated input in its rankings? I support the idea of trying to make the system support collaboration between curators in a native manner. It would make my life a lot easier. But it has to be done in a way that doesn't cause more problems then it solves, and that is always a huge risk in making these sorts of changes.
author | smooth |
---|---|
permlink | re-alitas-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t054127900z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 05:41:27 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 05:41:27 |
depth | 2 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 448 |
author_reputation | 253,602,537,834,068 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 740,500 |
net_rshares | 296,989,097 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
alitas | 0 | 296,989,097 | 100% |
> They did, but eventually it evolved into an automated (?) system Shouldn't that outcome possibly be instructive.
author | anonymint |
---|---|
permlink | re-smooth-re-alitas-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t070933591z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 07:09:27 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 07:09:48 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 115 |
author_reputation | 28,085,935,540,836 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 741,283 |
net_rshares | 0 |
excuse me ... i just wanted to say ... I'm 55 yrs old ... i have seen so much BS come and go ... this conversation, well is why I came here .. Fucking great minds working together to create solutions is to me the spice of life ... i am learning so damn much every minute it really gives me faith in humanity again ! i could care less about getting paid to contribute, it is what i learn here is what i love. I am NOT a writer, i'm a learner .. to me that is why steemit is so awesome ... I have read the classics .. this NeoThought is what rocks the world .. I am so proud of ALL of you ! I really mean that guys ! .. umm cough, cough ...excuse me, continue PLZ !
author | jtstreetman |
---|---|
permlink | re-smooth-re-alitas-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t075211145z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 07:52:18 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 07:52:18 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.078 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.022 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 665 |
author_reputation | 1,118,889,631,950 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 741,661 |
net_rshares | 185,237,002,591 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
idealist | 0 | 67,265,192,429 | 100% | ||
jonno-katz | 0 | 918,181,210 | 100% | ||
faddat | 0 | 70,839,545,367 | 100% | ||
anonymint | 0 | 46,214,083,585 | 100% |