Viewing a response to: @dantheman/people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards
I think all the concepts seem great! Steem Power/Stake is the main defense against sybil it seems. Essentially the system would allow larger stakeholders to delegate voting power. I do wonder if there is a more organic way of delegating that power. From a UX perspective, selecting 30 curators is an extra action that may be asking a lot of users. Perhaps a simple method to evenly distribute voting power on the blockchain to users you 'follow' may work? If you follow 50 you give 1/50 power to each. If 1000 you give 1/1000th... It may minimize the extensive recursive calculations?
| author | steemrollin |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t072237955z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-08-11 07:22:39 |
| last_update | 2016-08-11 07:23:39 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.029 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 592 |
| author_reputation | 85,821,573,953,798 |
| root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 741,405 |
| net_rshares | 88,796,504,585 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| edgeland | 0 | 88,796,504,585 | 100% |
hiveblocks