Interesting and _very_ telling.

Firstly, if you are talking with any accuracy (a rare event in your case, I admit), then you're saying that  I'm 100% delusional. 

That would qualify as mental illness.(using DSM guidelines)

That then being the case, (and based on your own assertion that I am indeed 100% delusional)....the fact that you would then spend your time belittling a mentally ill person is very telling...
_Why would you do that?_
That's not a very good personality trait _at all_....
It reeks of  insecurity, fear, and a bullying streak. 

Pickin' on the unfortunate? 
Not very _community minded_, you could say?

.
(Help yourself tip: ...authoritarians, (and bullies) frequently present as very controlling behaviors, on a day to day basis. 
Lots of domestic household  rules, that kind of thing. 
Choosing what your partner wears on social occasions -  that kind of thing...
...it can come from childhood experiences of being bullied themselves. Projection and fear of not being in control, can be the motivations behind it.

Leaving aside the belittlement of a mentally ill person for one moment...
(don't worry, mate, I do it all the time - lefties are totally fuckin' nuts!...they see logic as bullying!! )....


>Then, to think that anyone who did have the power to affect a bank would take the time out of their day to do it to you takes delusion to delusions of grandeur and self-importance.

Jumping to some mighty big conclusions again, aren't we?  
Not good.
This entire scenario you paint, came from your head - not mine...(are you delusional? lol)


Lets continue...

You correlate 'delusional' by me extrapolating significance of unbelievably high mathematical odds  of an occurrence of events. 
(4 events/days,  in 18 years, as a math answer - is pretty high- if you didn't know).
You see noticeable coincidences and thus 'being something of interest' as a failure of  logic (and even mental illness!!)
Math  would dictate otherwise.

(tip no2...never gamble - you'll lose a fortune. It's not for everyone.(yes, I'm aware you already  have lots lots). That would be the math again. 
Soz matey, couldn't resist that one. A cheap shot.
...looking on the bright side, though, 'the best lessons in life, are the ones that cost you the most'.
and if money is _all_ that you lose, then it's a pretty cheap lesson...


>I would also predict that with your long track record of attention-seeking behaviour and desire for !drama surrounding you,.... 

Based on what? 
(You appear to be  chronically poor at predictions, from what I can see). 
Pray tell about this track record....
You extrapolate 'attention seeking behavior' from what, exactly?

Things like.....(drum roll...)

#### Writing on a blog? Lol.
####  (by that metric, you would be far more attention seeking than I will ever be).

.....Oh, btw, (stifles some 100% delusional giggles, at this one....)

### If you are _not_ seeking some attention on a social media site, and blog - just what the hell _are_ you doing here then?

 ###### You could just be an investor in a financial instrument, I suppose. 
(hoping to be  a future profit taking rentier,  on the block chain?...)


>these events you claim to have happened have a very high probability of never having happened at all.

####  Ah, so you 'predict' that I'm lying?  Based on what, exactly? Math? 
No, didn't think so, yet you use the term 'probability'. 
Strange.
....little things like _facts_  to support your assertions, would be nice.
Otherwise it's just weak attempts to slur me, based on zero evidence. 

_.....are you trying to continue on with the alinsky tactics, you little tike? They don't work too well when they're pointed out – but do make you look disingenuous and small minded_.
(low IQ'ers might still fall for it, though).


####  psssst..... Your Ego is majorly screwing with you....

.....So anyways.... just what math do you use to work out this, ' high probability'?(of it 'never actually happened')
This might help you.....
https://www.dummies.com/education/math/probability/probability-for-dummies-cheat-sheet/

I look forward to your calculations...




Your predictions  don't seem to be that  too 'on the button' so far, to be honest.
Maybe you need to reevaluate your 'predictive' tools? 
Why not work out  _the potential_ of these tools you use,  based in real results...?( use steem as an isolated test case, it might serve you very well).
This way, the  re-evaluation of the tools you use for predictions,  is based in reality....scary territory, uh?


If you consider that  it was you that predicted that...wait for it....

#### .....'2+2 could, at some point, equal another number, _other than 4_'. 

(....with quantum computers or something you said, if I remember rightly...)

####  If you have some serious mental problems  predicting  the outcome of the  sum values of 2+2 - then I would posit that you _really do need to reassess your predictive talents_,  - and the tools that  you implement to arrive at your predictions.

(I repeat - Alinsky-esque strategies only work when they are _not_ called out, and brought out into the open. And on low Iq'ers.). 


I'm trying to help.