create account

RE: Steem Governance is Multiparty by tcpolymath

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @ned/re-tcpolymath-re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181012t204555678z

· @tcpolymath ·
$0.05
So the blockchain of your vision is going to run very similar content-voting-and-rewards systems on multiple levels of abstraction? That seems anathema to the efficiency-and-scaling doctrine. 

Once you've built new voting systems and dropped dApps into their SMT walled gardens, I think it's going to be way too tempting to drop first-layer content voting and rewards and just have the core blockchain support content storage and SMT operation, while all the rest is done per-dApp on the SMT layer, in the name of chain efficiency. And it's probably the right thing to do from a system design standpoint. 

It kind of calls into question why starting from Steem is a good idea, though.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authortcpolymath
permlinkre-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181013t031832388z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-10-13 03:18:33
last_update2018-10-13 03:18:33
depth5
children0
last_payout2018-10-20 03:18:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.041 HBD
curator_payout_value0.012 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length686
author_reputation72,516,729,960,969
root_title"Steem Governance is Multiparty"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id73,185,720
net_rshares40,493,145,155
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)