Viewing a response to: @ned/re-tcpolymath-re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181012t204555678z
So the blockchain of your vision is going to run very similar content-voting-and-rewards systems on multiple levels of abstraction? That seems anathema to the efficiency-and-scaling doctrine. Once you've built new voting systems and dropped dApps into their SMT walled gardens, I think it's going to be way too tempting to drop first-layer content voting and rewards and just have the core blockchain support content storage and SMT operation, while all the rest is done per-dApp on the SMT layer, in the name of chain efficiency. And it's probably the right thing to do from a system design standpoint. It kind of calls into question why starting from Steem is a good idea, though.
author | tcpolymath |
---|---|
permlink | re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-ned-re-tcpolymath-re-steemitblog-steem-governance-is-multiparty-20181013t031832388z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-10-13 03:18:33 |
last_update | 2018-10-13 03:18:33 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-10-20 03:18:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.041 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.012 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 686 |
author_reputation | 72,516,729,960,969 |
root_title | "Steem Governance is Multiparty" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 73,185,720 |
net_rshares | 40,493,145,155 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
lextenebris | 0 | 22,090,006,375 | 100% | ||
glenalbrethsen | 0 | 18,403,138,780 | 12% |