Viewing a response to: @pfunk/re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t191712534z
totally agree with you. @steemitblog call it what you want, you want to "tax" USERS.
author | thebluepanda |
---|---|
permlink | re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t193943197z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"users":["steemitblog"]} |
created | 2016-11-18 19:39:42 |
last_update | 2016-11-18 19:39:42 |
depth | 2 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 84 |
author_reputation | 37,591,154,470,762 |
root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,797,331 |
net_rshares | 0 |
We don't want tax, which is why we would direct it to 3rd party dev directed by community. We could also burn it or add it to reward pool.
author | dantheman |
---|---|
permlink | re-thebluepanda-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t200112493z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-18 20:01:12 |
last_update | 2016-11-18 20:01:12 |
depth | 3 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 139 |
author_reputation | 240,292,002,602,347 |
root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,797,458 |
net_rshares | 337,084,968,379 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
senseiteekay | 0 | 33,985,495,892 | 100% | ||
southbaybits | 0 | 63,929,415 | 100% | ||
ekitcho | 0 | 302,965,367,610 | 100% | ||
johnathanhenry | 0 | 70,175,462 | 76% |
After considering it more, and reading this comment, I realized that it's not about where the STEEM ends up at all. Just that it's not going to a post author. So that someone wouldn't feel like they were at a disadvantage for using a different front end service that rightfully charged a cut to make revenue from their creation. If there is no alternative solution, it may be necessary.
author | pfunk |
---|---|
permlink | re-dantheman-re-thebluepanda-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t121246616z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-19 12:13:00 |
last_update | 2016-11-19 12:13:00 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 386 |
author_reputation | 221,632,045,904,452 |
root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,801,324 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Glad you understand where we were coming from.
author | dantheman |
---|---|
permlink | re-pfunk-re-dantheman-re-thebluepanda-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t142547763z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-19 14:25:48 |
last_update | 2016-11-19 14:25:48 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 46 |
author_reputation | 240,292,002,602,347 |
root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,801,925 |
net_rshares | 40,248,887,627 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
senseiteekay | 0 | 33,985,495,892 | 100% | ||
jasen.g1311 | 0 | 230,835,840 | 100% | ||
dobermansden | 0 | 204,588,837 | 100% | ||
lighter | 0 | 496,793,722 | 100% | ||
badman | 0 | 228,842,927 | 100% | ||
goodtime | 0 | 278,550,026 | 100% | ||
sunnyd | 0 | 345,414,498 | 100% | ||
jayc | 0 | 230,064,461 | 100% | ||
lilwayne | 0 | 1,015,466,691 | 100% | ||
snoopdog | 0 | 1,004,795,225 | 100% | ||
tyga | 0 | 1,760,990,917 | 100% | ||
bo-1 | 0 | 133,924,676 | 100% | ||
betonit | 0 | 267,960,986 | 100% | ||
johnathanhenry | 0 | 65,162,929 | 76% |
I am cool with that as long as the dev is not part of steemit inc team and is chosen by the community. Nothing against the current devs of steemit inc. I know a few and they are quite good.
author | thebluepanda |
---|---|
permlink | re-dantheman-re-thebluepanda-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t202000222z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-18 20:20:00 |
last_update | 2016-11-18 20:21:42 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 189 |
author_reputation | 37,591,154,470,762 |
root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,797,583 |
net_rshares | 0 |