create account

RE: Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives by thebluepanda

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @pfunk/re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t191712534z

· @thebluepanda ·
totally agree with you. @steemitblog call it what you want, you want to "tax" USERS.
properties (22)
authorthebluepanda
permlinkre-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t193943197z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["steemitblog"]}
created2016-11-18 19:39:42
last_update2016-11-18 19:39:42
depth2
children4
last_payout2016-12-19 18:20:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length84
author_reputation37,591,154,470,762
root_title"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,797,331
net_rshares0
@dantheman ·
We don't want tax, which is why we would direct it to 3rd party dev directed by community.  We could also burn it or add it to reward pool.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authordantheman
permlinkre-thebluepanda-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t200112493z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 20:01:12
last_update2016-11-18 20:01:12
depth3
children3
last_payout2016-12-19 18:20:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length139
author_reputation240,292,002,602,347
root_title"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,797,458
net_rshares337,084,968,379
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@pfunk ·
After considering it more, and reading this comment, I realized that it's not about where the STEEM ends up at all. Just that it's not going to a post author. So that someone wouldn't feel like they were at a disadvantage for using a different front end service that rightfully charged a cut to make revenue from their creation. If there is no alternative solution, it may be necessary.
properties (22)
authorpfunk
permlinkre-dantheman-re-thebluepanda-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t121246616z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 12:13:00
last_update2016-11-19 12:13:00
depth4
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 18:20:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length386
author_reputation221,632,045,904,452
root_title"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,801,324
net_rshares0
@dantheman ·
Glad you understand where we were coming from.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authordantheman
permlinkre-pfunk-re-dantheman-re-thebluepanda-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t142547763z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 14:25:48
last_update2016-11-19 14:25:48
depth5
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 18:20:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length46
author_reputation240,292,002,602,347
root_title"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,801,925
net_rshares40,248,887,627
author_curate_reward""
vote details (14)
@thebluepanda · (edited)
I am cool with that as long as the dev is not part of steemit inc team and is chosen by the community. Nothing against the current devs of steemit inc. I know a few and they are quite good.
properties (22)
authorthebluepanda
permlinkre-dantheman-re-thebluepanda-re-pfunk-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t202000222z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 20:20:00
last_update2016-11-18 20:21:42
depth4
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 18:20:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length189
author_reputation37,591,154,470,762
root_title"Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,797,583
net_rshares0