Viewing a response to: @smooth/re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t182500000z
I think it actually requires more effort and work to curate comments. I think the rewards should be kept. It may not be an incentive right now but in the future with a higher Steem price it will become more relevant. The discussion is just as important as the posts and curation should be encouraged. I like the other ideas though.
author | thecryptofiend |
---|---|
permlink | re-smooth-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161118t183219515z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-18 18:32:18 |
last_update | 2016-11-18 18:32:18 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.025 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.008 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 335 |
author_reputation | 323,603,913,866,384 |
root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,796,872 |
net_rshares | 1,175,082,707,316 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
smooth | 0 | 594,227,907,611 | 1% | ||
smooth.witness | 0 | 133,398,047,468 | 1% | ||
teamsteem | 0 | 7,226,182,908 | 1% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 11,363,763,418 | 1% | ||
bitshares101 | 0 | 24,803,706,986 | 100% | ||
kateblack | 0 | 2,739,466,738 | 100% | ||
oldtimer | 0 | 380,145,123,925 | 100% | ||
richardjuckes | 0 | 20,481,277,431 | 100% | ||
heidstertrades | 0 | 697,230,831 | 100% |