Viewing a response to: @steemitblog/re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153933973z
Interesting - like a [Minergate](https://minergate.com) type setup? That would be ideal. I have a number of friends who were very non-technical and wouldn't even dare using regular miners (even on Windows) but they use their spare CPU/GPU time to mine using Minergate. It makes it really easy for new users so something like that would be perfect. Obviously the issue of centralisation comes up if there is a single pool doing it though.
author | thecryptofiend |
---|---|
permlink | re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t154515413z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://minergate.com"]} |
created | 2016-11-18 15:45:15 |
last_update | 2016-11-18 15:45:15 |
depth | 5 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 17:46:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 448 |
author_reputation | 323,603,913,866,384 |
root_title | "Final Review of Steem Economic Changes" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,795,723 |
net_rshares | 165,222,594,174 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
charlie777pt | 0 | 2,984,486,832 | 100% | ||
dailybitcoinnews | 0 | 10,716,132,643 | 100% | ||
joanaltres | 0 | 6,047,809,489 | 100% | ||
tonyson4078 | 0 | 145,474,165,210 | 100% | ||
networker5 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
I was just thinking @Minergate should do this. Would be great.
author | dailybitcoinnews |
---|---|
permlink | re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161121t074704494z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-21 07:47:15 |
last_update | 2016-11-21 07:47:15 |
depth | 6 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 17:46:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 62 |
author_reputation | 90,771,889,126,829 |
root_title | "Final Review of Steem Economic Changes" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,813,486 |
net_rshares | 14,635,075,667 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
thecryptofiend | 0 | 11,710,278,571 | 1% | ||
charlie777pt | 0 | 2,924,797,096 | 100% | ||
networker5 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Agreed. Something like Minergate would be great. It's so easy to get started mining on Windows with their software.
author | joanaltres |
---|---|
permlink | re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t213446527z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-11-18 21:34:51 |
last_update | 2016-11-18 21:34:51 |
depth | 6 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-12-19 17:46:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 115 |
author_reputation | 3,350,997,703,778 |
root_title | "Final Review of Steem Economic Changes" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,798,032 |
net_rshares | 169,792,810,428 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
thecryptofiend | 0 | 11,391,066,277 | 1% | ||
charlie777pt | 0 | 2,924,797,096 | 100% | ||
dailybitcoinnews | 0 | 10,716,132,643 | 100% | ||
steemitfaucet | 0 | 2,196,132,506 | 100% | ||
tonyson4078 | 0 | 142,564,681,906 | 100% | ||
networker5 | 0 | 0 | 100% |