Viewing a response to: @condra/re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t023128715z
I will admit to doing this on many posts, and I'm sure others have done the same. I upvoted this post. Why? Because I know that hundreds of other people will be upvoting on it soon, and my early vote will give me a better curation bonus than the other posts I could vote on instead. Does this post deserve my upvote? Yes - I think this is a very important change being discusses, and I am **really** happy that @dantheman and the Steemit team are giving it so much thought. Would the amount that got added to this post make a bigger deal if it got distributed to some awesome minnow who just spent the past 6 hours creating the best post of their lives? Yes! There are a lot of other posts out there though that have **really** good content too, and they are only getting a few cents per post.
author | timcliff |
---|---|
permlink | re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t041750794z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"users":["dantheman"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 04:17:48 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 04:17:48 |
depth | 2 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 797 |
author_reputation | 272,954,445,077,789 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 739,549 |
net_rshares | 10,042,975,543 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bendjmiller222 | 0 | 10,042,975,543 | 100% |
Agreed! And some great content creators may only try three or four articles that took days to make if their reward is only $1.00 This post obviously needed to trend so that it would be weighed in heavily and commented on so a best solution can be implemented
author | bendjmiller222 |
---|---|
permlink | re-timcliff-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t042719831z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 04:27:21 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 04:27:21 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 259 |
author_reputation | 24,513,111,975,788 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 739,657 |
net_rshares | 2,186,898,344 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
timcliff | 0 | 2,186,898,344 | 100% |
Thank you Tim for being honest. This was the right time and place to let them know. I know a lot of people are voting up high $ value posts, because you know its going to be worth something rather than voting a post stuck at 10 cents or 15 cents. :)
author | intelliguy |
---|---|
permlink | re-timcliff-re-condra-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t042356836z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
created | 2016-08-11 04:24:12 |
last_update | 2016-08-11 04:24:12 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 251 |
author_reputation | 62,276,657,564,898 |
root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 739,622 |
net_rshares | 2,186,898,344 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
timcliff | 0 | 2,186,898,344 | 100% |