Viewing a response to: @dantheman/people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards
[Edit] Based on some of the other comments that are starting to get posted, I think I am starting to understand this. Is it basically that someone with a high amount of SP can designate a certain number of people to 'share' in their Steem Power, so the weight of those people's votes is more than what they would have with their own SP? [Edit2] If you have time to give an example of how this would play out with an actual post and people voting, it would really help clarify things! One thought is we should probably make this vote power sharing separate from 'following'. There are a lot of people I like to follow because they produce good content, but if I were to designate someone to share in my SP voting power, I would probably select different people.
| author | timcliff |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t033418281z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-08-11 03:34:15 |
| last_update | 2016-08-11 04:24:12 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 1.906 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.628 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 762 |
| author_reputation | 272,954,445,077,789 |
| root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 739,045 |
| net_rshares | 2,272,541,457,394 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| samupaha | 0 | 2,227,487,170,764 | 100% | ||
| anonymint | 0 | 42,822,757,707 | 100% | ||
| timcliff | 0 | 2,231,528,923 | 100% |
> Based on some of the other comments that are starting to get posted, I think I am starting to understand this. Is it basically that someone with a high amount of SP can designate a certain number of people to 'share' in their Steem Power, so the weight of those people's votes is more than what they would have with their own SP? But as I pointed out in my longest comment post, this reduces concentration of votes, thus opening a potential vulnerability to those who will (collude to) form voting pacts (coalitions) to game the rewards for their maximum benefit.
| author | anonymint |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-timcliff-re-dantheman-people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards-20160811t065316949z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-08-11 06:53:12 |
| last_update | 2016-08-11 07:22:15 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-09-10 19:32:42 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 566 |
| author_reputation | 28,085,935,540,836 |
| root_title | "People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 741,134 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks