Viewing a response to: @noisy/re-timcliff-re-noisy-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t122443054z
It's a good suggestion. I agree 100% that whatever solution they implement, it is probably going to complicate things! I hope they can come up with a good solution that strikes the right balance.
| author | timcliff |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-noisy-re-timcliff-re-noisy-re-steemitblog-proposed-upgrade-for-blockchain-incentives-20161119t145933206z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"]} |
| created | 2016-11-19 14:59:33 |
| last_update | 2016-11-19 14:59:33 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2016-12-19 18:20:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 195 |
| author_reputation | 272,954,445,077,789 |
| root_title | "Proposed Upgrade for Blockchain Incentives" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 1,802,055 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks