RE: Understanding Steem's Economic Flaw, Its Effects on the Network, and How to Fix It. by twinner

`author`	twinner
`permlink`	re-kevinwong-re-twinner-re-kevinwong-understanding-steem-s-economic-flaw-its-effects-on-the-network-and-how-to-fix-it-20181018t201036224z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-10-18 20:10:36
`last_update`	2018-10-18 20:10:36
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2018-10-25 20:10:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.371 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.121 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	141
`author_reputation`	67,053,192,912,359
`root_title`	"Understanding Steem's Economic Flaw, Its Effects on the Network, and How to Fix It."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	73,574,632
`net_rshares`	407,251,562,051
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	rshares	pct
kevinwong	139,029,061,666	2%
maarnio	268,005,841,682	100%
cheneats	216,658,703	60%

voter

weight

wgt%

rshares

pct

time

kevinwong

0 B

139,029,061,666

maarnio

0 B

268,005,841,682

100%

cheneats

0 B

216,658,703

60%

@kevinwong · Oct 19 '18 (edited)

I think changing only the curation rewards to 75% is in effect the same as what we have now at 25%. There's a symmetry. For example, 0% curation rewards is in effect the same as if we use 100% curation rewards. When it's 0% curation rewards, users will highly likely farm their own posts only, which is the same as if there's 100% curation rewards. It boils down to what the inflation is being used for. That's why we chose 50% curation rewards as one part of the proposal.

properties (22)