Viewing a response to: @netuoso/q66f0e
While the hearts may have been in the right place, the precedent set by this (Top 20 Witnesses ability to take anyone's stake away from them) will probably keep anyone from investing in steem ever again. Why should they? The ninja-mined stake was a problem, but taking it away after someone just paid $10m for it is not the solution, plus I am sure there are legal issues with what was done. If this was truly about helping steem and not just preserving the current witnesses (which is what it looks like), **All THE TOP 20 WITNESSES SHOULD STEP DOWN INDEFINITELY.**
| author | wattersblue |
|---|---|
| permlink | q681k2 |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.2"} |
| created | 2020-02-24 19:45:15 |
| last_update | 2020-02-24 19:45:15 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 2 |
| last_payout | 2020-03-02 19:45:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.014 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.013 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 568 |
| author_reputation | 214,958,052,087 |
| root_title | "Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 95,789,889 |
| net_rshares | 178,763,432,781 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gunsmithing | 0 | 157,681,236,993 | 100% | ||
| danile666 | 0 | -26,992,103,377 | -100% | ||
| fracasgrimm | 0 | 3,700,074,323 | 100% | ||
| superlao | 0 | 37,505,209,725 | 100% | ||
| wattersblue | 0 | 2,307,680,622 | 100% | ||
| southernwolf | 0 | 4,561,334,495 | 100% |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_of_stolen_goods The ninja-mined stake might not fit accurately the "stolen goods" definition, but the point stands ... you can not transfer fraudulent items to another part and have the fraudulence magically disappear. If the stake had a contractual obligation, that contract remains with the entity that was purchased, in this case SteemIt, Inc. I am not a lawyer and I know you aren't a lawyer either so how about we leave the legal mumbo jumbo to the lawyers. >All THE TOP 20 WITNESSES SHOULD STEP DOWN INDEFINITELY. Then campaign to have them removed. Participate in the consensus protocol on Steem. Maybe you also failed to understand the network before you started using it. That is your fault, not the communities or the witnesses. Also, come on @wattersblue, you have a 60 SP account (~$13). And you think your voice somehow should be able to influence those with hundreds of thousands invested in this blockchain? Put your money where your mouth is. Get involved and make a project. UPDATE YOUR PROFILE PICTURE. Something, anything, before you try and act like you somehow speak for everyone. > While the hearts may have been in the right place, the precedent set by this (Top 20 Witnesses ability to take anyone's stake away from them) will probably keep anyone from investing in steem ever again. Why should they? I have spoken directly with investors that have purchased hundreds of thousands of dollars of STEEM and run their business on the blockchain. Have you? The ones I spoke to personally have said what the witnesses did is the reason why they are buying more STEEM. You don't have to take my word for it. You could get off your lazy ass and go find those "investors" that you are speaking for and get their actual opinions too. *Also, you are clearly a sock puppet account. If you can't even speak your opinions from your main account then your opinions clearly don't mean much to you. Why are you hiding?*
| author | netuoso |
|---|---|
| permlink | q6823y |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"users":["wattersblue"],"links":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_of_stolen_goods"],"app":"steemit/0.2"} |
| created | 2020-02-24 19:57:33 |
| last_update | 2020-02-24 20:03:51 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2020-03-02 19:57:33 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 1,978 |
| author_reputation | 151,901,967,807,285 |
| root_title | "Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 95,790,248 |
| net_rshares | 11,658,409,001 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| jaguar.force | 0 | 11,658,409,001 | 100% |
<b>Possession of stolen goods</b> Possession of stolen goods is a crime in which an individual has bought, been given, or acquired stolen goods. In many jurisdictions, if an individual has accepted possession of goods or property and knew they were stolen, then the individual is typically charged with a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the value of the stolen goods. If the individual did not know the goods were stolen, then the goods are returned to the owner and the individual is not prosecuted. However, there are often exceptions, because of the difficulty of proving or disproving an individual's knowledge that the goods were stolen.
| author | wikitextbot |
|---|---|
| permlink | 20200224t195740094z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["test"],"app":"steemjs/examples"} |
| created | 2020-02-24 19:57:39 |
| last_update | 2020-02-24 19:57:39 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2020-03-02 19:57:39 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 646 |
| author_reputation | 231,556,605,589 |
| root_title | "Steem Consensus Witness Statement: Code Updated" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 95,790,251 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks