Viewing a response to: @noisy/why-our-way-of-distributing-steem-by-voting-sucks-why-it-does-not-scale-and-how-we-can-improve-this-situation
I missed this post but agree with everything in it. If most (or maybe even half of) large accounts just delegated steem power to responsible curators of quality content, there would be no need for so much fluffy fluff to fix this and that, nothing would be broken.
| author | whatamidoing |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-noisy-why-our-way-of-distributing-steem-by-voting-sucks-why-it-does-not-scale-and-how-we-can-improve-this-situation-20180913t091133295z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2018-09-13 09:11:36 |
| last_update | 2018-09-13 09:11:36 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2018-09-20 09:11:36 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 265 |
| author_reputation | 186,276,751,633,766 |
| root_title | "Why our way of distributing Steem by voting sucks, why it does not scale and how we can improve this situation" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 71,160,071 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks